3/23/2007 11:28am, #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
Nutrition Accuracy in Popular Magazines
American Council on Science and Health published a paper where by they studied the factual evidence of the claims made by the magazines.
Glamour, Ladiesí Home Journal, Shape, Child, Parents, Cooking Light, Fitness, Womanís Day, Good Housekeeping, Redbook, Self, Health, Runnerís World, Better Homes and Gardens, Prevention
Menís Health, Readerís Digest, Cosmopolitan, Muscle and Fitness
3/23/2007 2:56pm, #2
So you'd get a better level of nutrition advice in Glamor then you would in Men's health.
I hope matthius/bao/wtfever still lurks here to see this.You can't make people smarter. You can expose them to information, but your responsibility stops there.
3/23/2007 3:50pm, #3
Originally Posted by PirateJon
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Seattle, WA area
I'm not voting one way or the other.
However, I've read enough scientific and anecdotal studies from a variety of sources to conclude that the current science behind fitness and diet is anything but rock-solid.
There is still a whole lot we don't know or understand yet, and some of what we do understand -- or think we understand -- is still the result of looking at relatively smaller pieces of the whole puzzle.
3/23/2007 11:05pm, #4
That's my biggest beef with the article. They don't distinguish between stuff that was "proven" 50 years ago by science and stuff that has come out within the last few years. It's like creating a research paper and then only being judged on whether or not you properly cited your sources, not on what the sources are.
Edit: Also a lot of the magazines they laud as being "more scientific" always have those ridiculous spot reduction articles (Target Belly Fat! Lose 10" Off Your Hips!) that make me want to set fire to the magazine rack.
Last edited by War Wizard; 3/23/2007 11:08pm at ."Keep a sharp knife, shiny boots and be on time."
3/24/2007 3:00am, #5
The accuracy of the information is probably from 0 to 40% accurate. It varies greatly within even one issue. The thing about nutrition and physiology is that these are fields where things are greatly different now than they were 10 years ago, where things we thought were one way we now think are another. That, and everyone is full of **** and wanting to make a buck off of the idiot public.Tough is not how you act, tough is how you train.