Results 41 to 45 of 45
-
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,787
- Points
- 22,178



Posted On:
9/07/2003 10:34am -
The man they call FoM
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 3,593
Posted On:
9/07/2003 6:31pm -
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 1
- Points
- 55
Posted On:
6/23/2010 1:53pm -
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 1
- Points
- 41
Posted On:
1/30/2012 9:23pm
--
My Experience
Just want to add my two cents. My father in law was a professional body guard who was in the first civilian SCARS course and several follow up courses over several years. He trained one on one with Jerry, Blake and Tim at SCARS. We have a shelf of training books and videos from that group and the 3rd PAT made is numbered and signed by Jerry, it hangs in my garage. My fav book from SCARS is the autokenematic striking manual from the 90's, written by Chris who is now a master instructor with TFT. I never trained with SCARS or met Jerry in person but I have trained and studied their materials heavily and I have attended three TFT seminars, I own several TFT videos. I also have the family experience to draw from. Having said all that I believe TFT is a superior product. The TFT methodology is easier to internalize, the risk to the student in training is lower and the quality of the videos is better. The systems have similarities, but the way in which the course is taught and the personalities of the instructors are very different. In addition, the customer service after you train with TFT is far superior even if you have not spent money in awhile. With our family exposure to both systems there is no way we would spend money with anyone but Tim, period.
I will add that both systems are real, both work, TFT is easier to absorb and is just a better bang for your buck. I also love the way TFT is always presented as a absolute last chance no alternative option.Last edited by GMM; 1/30/2012 9:30pm at .



Reply With Quote













Registered Member
Posted On:
9/07/2003 9:40am