I'm not a fan of the 'closed door' approach to classes, and I've never heard an explanation for doing it that I was willing to acept as viable. The best of the bunch goes something like:
"We're going to invest a lot of time in training you, and in return we want committment. We also don't want you going off after a few lessons and teaching our stuff elsewhere." but even that one isn't very good. I mean, if a class is so much better than everything else people won't go elsewhere because everything else will be inferior.
The usual closed-door thing is more like 'we're rubbish and we can't afford anyone bursting the bubble by discovering competence elsewhere'.
I was once in a position of having to choose between a class that was genuinely very good but didn't allow training elsewhere and everything else in the world. I chose the latter, on the grounds that, well, if I train with you 4 hours a week, I'm my own man the other 164 and in any case... if you go into a room and shut the door, you can't see what's happening outside. And you know what? All that stuff going on outside might be pretty good...
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO