230565 Bullies, 4103 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 1 to 8 of 8
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. Tomas Drgon is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    629

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 11:00am


     Style: n/a

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    blue gi FTW

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...ture04306.html

    It turns out that blue gis are more likely to win...assuming the distribution of gi colors among competitors is random, which there are some doubts about due to how competitors are seeded into the blue and white slots, but all and all they have an interesting point.

    I remmber reading similar statistics in other sports, where red clad competitors were more likely to win...I'll try to dig out the article...

    So it's actually RED gi FTW!!!
    :)

    Tomas

    Tomas
  2. Tomas Drgon is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    629

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 11:30am


     Style: n/a

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Here we go...RED FTW..:

    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal...s/435293a.html
    ========
    Psychology: Red enhances human performance in contests
    Russell A. Hill and Robert A. Barton

    Red coloration is a sexually selected, testosterone-dependent signal of male quality in a variety of animals and in some non-human species a male's dominance can be experimentally increased by attaching artificial red stimuli6. Here we show that a similar effect can influence the outcome of physical contests in humans across a range of sports, we find that wearing red is consistently associated with a higher probability of winning. These results indicate not only that sexual selection may have influenced the evolution of human response to colours, but also that the colour of sportswear needs to be taken into account to ensure a level playing field in sport.
    ========

    Tomas
  3. DevonHartigan is offline
    DevonHartigan's Avatar

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    302

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 11:34am


     Style: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    You need a subscription to view the first article. But the blue gi rules.
  4. Tomas Drgon is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    629

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 11:42am


     Style: n/a

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    here's a PDF of the blue gi article.

    Tomas
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails nature04306.pdf  

  5. UpaLumpa is offline
    UpaLumpa's Avatar

    Exasperated.

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Descending into absurdity
    Posts
    6,977

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 4:23pm

    supporting member
     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Tomas Drgon
    It turns out that blue gis are more likely to win...assuming the distribution of gi colors among competitors is random, which there are some doubts about due to how competitors are seeded into the blue and white slots, but all and all they have an interesting point.
    Helps to actually read the articles you copy from other forums:

    Corrigendum: Sporting contests: Seeing red? Putting sportswear into context

    C. Rowe, J. M. Harris, S. C. Roberts

    Nature 437, doi: 10.1038/nature04306 (2005)

    It has been drawn to our attention by David Matsumoto and Stephanie Hata that our first-round analysis of the Athens 2004 judo competition was biased by non-random allocation of blue judogis to a small number of seeded competitors. Although only 25 of 301 contests analysed are affected, the assumptions upon which those analyses were based were therefore incorrect. However, their reanalysis (D. M. and S. H., unpublished results), which excludes first-round matches, supports our conclusion that winning biases exist for male judo competitors wearing blue. Our interpretation of visibility-influenced winning biases therefore remains a valid and plausible alternative to that of Hill and Barton (R. A. Hill and R. A. Barton Nature 435, 293; 2005).
  6. Tomas Drgon is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    629

    Posted On:
    1/12/2007 4:45pm


     Style: n/a

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Some of it could be scoring bias...

    Too bad there's so few blue gis at local tournaments, I'd do my own study...

    Tomas
  7. Andrew L. is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    83

    Posted On:
    1/13/2007 1:21am


     Style: Still searching...

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    The red trunks sure didnt help Couture in his bout with Lidell.

    I think color means **** all and perhaps could only have a tiny impact if the fighters were dead even skill wise.
  8. Tomas Drgon is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    629

    Posted On:
    1/13/2007 10:23pm


     Style: n/a

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew L.
    The red trunks sure didnt help Couture in his bout with Lidell.

    I think color means **** all and perhaps could only have a tiny impact if the fighters were dead even skill wise.
    I don't think there's a good statistics done on MMA yet.

    Actually, that's what the judo paper says (I think). The bigger the difference in scores (implied skill), the smaller the advantage for blue.

    Tomas

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.