Martial artist vs untrained person?

***JohnnyCache*** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 4:30am

Originally Posted by Deadbolt

depends on their mind sets

but given that your going to say they are both even

i would say the non trained twin IF they are both naturaly agressive

and the trained twin IF they are both non agressive by nature

if the non trained twin also put on 20 KG of muscle then definitely the non trained twin

Why does the non trained twin mostly win ?

Because one year is generaly speaking not enought training to become sufficiently good at most styles to beat an equal abilitied (real word?) person.

Of course the real question is what it there not twins but insted are tripplets !

He said 20 POUNDS of muscle. That's only about 9 kilos.

Also, one year of BJK will probably make you a worse fighter - if you took, say, boxing and judo for that year, a different story. You're making some pretty tremendous generalizations.

***JohnnyCache*** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 4:31am

Originally Posted by Deadbolt

the Trained twin will be thinking about using his training

while the non trained twin will only be thinking about hurting the other twin

this is why MA with under 10 years experience get beat up in pubs so often, that and incorrect distance

If you haven't fought enough in a year to learn what distance to fight from and to ingrain basic technique into you, you're very likely at a **** school. He specified "good" training.

**RunningDog** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 5:08am

Reading this thred maid me dum

**Virus** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 5:16am

Why does it take ten years and why ten specificly (as opposed to say five or three)?

**Roidie McDouchebag** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 5:28am

Worst thread ever.

**Toby Christensen** · Posted On: 11/29/2006 6:16am

I have had no real training apart from the RNC. My twin did a year of TKD and his kicks fucking hurt, but I headlock him effectively.

Has that answered your question?

(Coming from a twin)