-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Posts
- 838
- Points
- 2,308


Posted On:
10/06/2006 8:52pm
Style: default std--
Maybe "builds", "establishes", or "develops" as opposed to "perfects". Most masters IMO seem to often with humility (whether real or feigned) suggest the whole journey thing, i.e the art/style is never "perfected" - their lives are spent in making it better
Originally Posted by Samuel Browning
"common principles" or in their execution exhibit an underlying physical style and similarity -
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 61
Posted On:
10/06/2006 8:55pm -
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,808
- Points
- 22,276



Posted On:
10/06/2006 10:07pm -
Y SO SRIUS?
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Black Belt City, Mississippi
- Posts
- 5,516
- Points
- 32,284



Posted On:
10/06/2006 10:08pm--
Wouldnt it be better to say,
Originally Posted by Samuel Browning
That once a master perfects his particular "Art" then he adds techniques to his liking and removes the ones he doesnt.
I agree that the tech selection should have common principles so they fit better into the definition of "style"
This would be more of Martial Art Style.
Am I making sense here? It seems like it but Im not sure. -
Y SO SRIUS?
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Black Belt City, Mississippi
- Posts
- 5,516
- Points
- 32,284



Posted On:
10/06/2006 10:09pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Texas
- Posts
- 242
Posted On:
10/06/2006 11:06pm
Style: savate--
Martial arts style (n).: a pedagogy designed to allow an instructor to train students to fight effectively within a given sociocultural context, usually taking into account specific theories of tactics and effective human movement.
----
This definition should cover all bases, irrespective of:
a) "fighter" vs "style"
b) "military" vs "self-defense/sport"
c) "training for combat" vs "training for ancillary benefits" -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 334
Posted On:
10/06/2006 11:08pm
Style: bjj--
I think a style is as represented by the fighting style of its founder.
Meaning the techniques that the founder tends to gravitate when he spars form the basis of his style.
The techniques in the style may or may not share a common theme. But are taught as one entity with a distinct strategy, rather than trained seperately based on the techniques common principle.
For example, the difference between judo and bjj is on their differing strategy/focus rather than on their repertoires of techniques making it two different and distinct styles rather than a collection of the same techniques taught under 2 different name.
While muay thai might employ different techniques that differ in theme but are taught as a cohesive whole. A sweep in clinch as opposed to a roundhouse kick. For example. -
I decided I'd have a pretty avatar for a while.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Sheffield, England
- Posts
- 1,665
- Points
- 8,475


Posted On:
10/07/2006 8:16am



Reply With Quote














Posted On:
10/06/2006 8:10pm
Definition of MA Style