-
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 4,603
- Points
- 7,706

Posted On:
5/17/2009 8:58am--
Check out the Bullshido.net Western Martial Arts Forum for all things Western, martial and arty.
Bartitsu: the Gentlemanly Art of Self Defence (est. 1899) -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- North of San Francisco
- Posts
- 4,518
- Points
- 20,368



Posted On:
5/22/2009 8:25pm--
One explanation I heard was from a Systema dude who is also a Judo BB and MoS in Sambo. He said that cage-fighting was beneath him, that it was crude and base. Something like this.
Now this is a very skilled and strong man that I don't think I'd have any hope of beating, but I found his answer so incredibly odd. Like, dude, "You train to throw sharpened-shovels at a tree=torso target? That's not crude?"
That attitude is fine for someone with the sport and military experience he has, but how do you ever expect to convey combatives to a civilian without the most basic of tests of a fighting style, which is to fight?
I'll never get that part of it...Many things we do naturally become difficult only when we try to make them intellectual subjects. It is possible to know so much about a subject that you become totally ignorant.
-Mentat Text Two (dicto) -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- USA-formerly NE, currently Midwest
- Posts
- 230
- Points
- 2,404

Posted On:
5/22/2009 8:58pm -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- North of San Francisco
- Posts
- 4,518
- Points
- 20,368



Posted On:
5/22/2009 10:33pm--
well, that's part #2 of my complaint re:Systema. How is it a fighting style of its own if it hasn't been proven effective? Srsly. The fact that he is a big dude and a known badass in other styles reinforces my impression. Same goes for Vlad Vasiliev who is a skilled boxer and himself a former Soviet military guy. Pretty much any noteworthy Systema instructor already has a deep combatives/competetive fighting/martial arts background.
I really like all of the people I know who train in Systema, I don't want to troll them here or anywhere else. I just don't understand how this is a complete system if there isn't any way to prove it so...Many things we do naturally become difficult only when we try to make them intellectual subjects. It is possible to know so much about a subject that you become totally ignorant.
-Mentat Text Two (dicto) -
poser
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley / Rochester
- Posts
- 1,987
- Points
- 8,031

Posted On:
5/22/2009 11:09pm -
Choked out by Gene Lebell
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Grand Blanc, MI
- Posts
- 3,276
- Points
- 5,060


Posted On:
5/23/2009 2:17pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Posts
- 199
- Points
- 4,482

Posted On:
5/27/2009 1:35pm
Style: systema/RMA--
TheOtherSerge raises a good point about "complete system".
Systema is focused on developing fundamentals - breathing, relaxation, form & movement. These are usually worked in an environment that emphasizes combatives rather than competition with common scenarios being multiple and/or armed opponents.
In this environment you will never learn how to clinch and throw a well trained judo or sambo player. That is a very different and specific exercise and skill set. But you certainly do learn how to hit, be hit, fall, and move among a bunch of people who are trying to hurt you.
The general/fundamental nature of the primary skill set is highly applicable in learning other arts and has proved to be highly desirable to practitioners of other arts looking to expand. This is why such highly skilled practitioners as Val Riazanov and TheOtherSerge's big friend find value in the training.
So, getting into the semantics now: Systema is not a complete system in the sense of judo/sambo. They are really not the same thing. I think of systema as an operating system (I think this is DdlR's analogy) in contrast to a sambo application. In a nutshell, it is a very broad and general training framework for martial arts and combatives rather than a specific skill-set intended to maximize performance for a particular application. That said, we do work with a lot of contact and we do develop skills.
but this has all been said before
qualifier: regarding sambo as an application. This is an imperfect analogy. I understand that form, movement, breathing etc are a significant component of samba & judo training. I only wish to emphasize that there is relatively more emphasis on these aspects in systema training and relatively less on technique or specific skill development.Last edited by EricH; 5/27/2009 1:41pm at .
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- Bedfordshire England
- Posts
- 294
- Points
- 3,115


Posted On:
5/27/2009 3:06pm



Reply With Quote
















Choked out by Gene Lebell
Posted On:
5/17/2009 8:52am
Style: Judo