Page 5 of 5 First 12345
  1. #41
    DerAuslander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    18,449
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I'm going to have to condemn this as a heretical travesty.

    We all know it is impossible to do Aikido for chicks.

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,173
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I thought Hapkido was Aikido with Kimchi

  3. #43

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Seattle, WA area
    Posts
    1,044
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by mrblackmagic
    Aikido/Taekwondo, if I am not mistaken is just Hapkido.
    Nonsense! It's "Taekido!"

    It's a totally different art.

    -daGorilla

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,173
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by DerAuslander108
    I'm going to have to condemn this as a heretical travesty.

    We all know it is impossible to do Aikido for chicks.
    Jur, jur, jur...

    Su búsqueda - aikido chick - no produjo ningún documento.

    Sugerencias:

    * Asegúrese de que todas las palabras estén escritas correctamente.
    * Intente usar otras palabras.
    * Intente usar palabras más generales.
    * Intente usar menos palabras.
    LOL!

  5. #45
    Judah Maccabee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,325
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    This martial art USED to have a wikipedia entry.

    Emphasis on "used to."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...letion/Taekido

  6. #46

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    360
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by mrblackmagic
    Aikido/Taekwondo, if I am not mistaken is just Hapkido.
    No, it's not.

  7. #47

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    6,918
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Afrin
    I mean, common...
    this **** is starting to get to me. it's "come on" not "common". how fucking hard is that?! "common" doesn't even make sense in this context.... what were you thinking? this is right up there with "would of" "should of" "could of". THINK GOD DAMMIT.
    Last edited by MaverickZ; 6/17/2006 7:11pm at .

Page 5 of 5 First 12345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO