The real reason religious whackjobs dont approve of the morning after pill.
Link about what the "good guys" are doing in response to the pro-life idiocy.
It is actually quite intricate and well thought out.
See I have figured out thier plan.
With unplanned pregnancy on the rise among the poor. Pro lifers want to create more poor, this way when there are so many of them, thier ultimate goal is to repeal the slavery prohibitions by having these increased poor people sell themselves into slavery! They will have the exception of if someone "chooses slavery".
Need further proof?
Just look at the racial demographic where large numbers of unplanned pregnancies occur.
We should call pro-lifers by thier true name now: Anti-abolitionists. or Pro-Slavery.
If you think that is a "straw-man" it is no more made of straw than the argument used to prohibit the FDA from making the morning after pill a non-scrib drug.
Now that's logic hard at work right there.
Consider my mind blown, and my cerebral semen is all over this thread.
As good a theory as this is, and it is very interesting, I think the main reason is that they hold the mistaken belief that the pill will abort the fertilised egg, thus pro-lifers think they have an argument.
It just blocks ovulation if pregnancy hasn't already occured.
I'm guessing these people don't clip (?) their toenails ? If they feel so strongly about disposing of some cells.
How the hell do they get their neurons to fire nonsequencially like that?
You know the kid who played with balls of mercury in his hand in science class?
I don't know if your theory is right but iin my country they are trying pull of the market the morning after pill.
Something about being dangerous to your health and not carrying enough info.
What's the odds that their Baptist University-dwelling brats use the MAP when they get some dolt pregnant or are that pregnant dolt?
Condoms split, women get raped and sometimes the pill fails. Quite why the 'Pros' care more for a clump of foetal cells over the lives of young, often vulnerable women is proof, of course, of their cynicism and misanthropy. Their outlook is anything but pro-life.
Acupuncturist / Anesthesia Student
Originally Posted by gramlock
Wait, is that true? I thought it released a large amount of estrogen and/or progesterone to signal...wait a second. If the decrease in estrogen and progesterone is what signals the uterus to menstruate, but an intact corpeus luteum will secrete estrogen and progesterone, which keeps the levels up so that uterus does not shed its lining, then how does taking a large amount of exogenous estrogen and/or progesterone stimulate the wall of the uterus to be shed?
Edit: you are indeed correct. Hmmm...so how does this violate the prolife movement if the egg isn't fertilized. Oh wait, it prevents ovulation which may lead to a fertilized egg.
Honestly, I don't understand why women are allowed to wear clothes since it slows down the protocol of getting them knocked up.
Last edited by Quikfeet509; 5/10/2006 2:21pm at .
From the link.
The drug has no effect if a woman is already pregnant. It works by blocking ovulation or fertilization
Maybe it's wrong but its always been what I thought it did.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO