222059 Bullies, 3480 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 51 to 60 of 135
Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst ... 23456 78910 ... LastLast
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. MrMcHarHar is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    24

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 2:17am


     Style: Jiu Jitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Gwinn
    It sounds like you're talking about the "bolt." Is it a metal moving part that rides inside the receiver of the gun? Gets slammed back when you fire, then slams back forward, stripping the next round out of the magazine and sliding it into the chamber.


    BTW, it sounds like you're saying the SIG550 doesn't have a semi-automatic mode. Surely not?
    1. yep so its the bolt.
    2. The sig 550 has (as i think most modern auto rifles) 3 fire modes: SA, Burst, FA. You can disable non-permanently the burst and fa modes by inserting a sort of catch. In this case you see a white dot.
    You need to do this for ensuring that you do not fire unintentionally multiple shots on a 300m range
    (multiple shots in a small shooting range are very dangerous, especially if for example there are cows eating grass below the line of fire (no kidding, i really shot at such a place once) ! it always could happen that you switch your fire selector too far => wrong fire mode => not permitted if disabled).
    Also, soldiers are ordered to do this when transporting the rifle, especially in public (not that it really adds to the safety, but people feel more save).

    If you retire from the army however, the ownership of the gun changes, it becomes your own rifle. In that case the swiss army has means for permanently disabling the burst and auto modes. So in the end there are no private persons owning operating automatic guns in switzerland.
    (the ownership of the military rifles (law ****) stays with the governement, even though the rifle is personal and kept at home. For example if you treat your gun like **** and destroy the barrel, the governement can charge you a new barrel, which is as far as I know over 1000$ )
  2. DAYoung is offline
    DAYoung's Avatar

    Crouching Philosopher, Hidden Philosopher

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    6,269

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 2:23am

    supporting member
     Style: n/a (ex-Karate)

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by MrMcHarHar
    (multiple shots in a small shooting range are very dangerous, especially if for example there are cows eating grass below the line of fire (no kidding, i really shot at such a place once)!
    A quail once wandered across the line of fire on a range here in Victoria. Simultaneously hilarious and tragic. I was watching it as it wandered. I'm not sure what hit it, but it suddenly just disappeared in a puff of dirt.
    Martial Arts and Philosophy: Beating and Nothingness
    click here to order on Amazon

  3. Truculent Sheep is offline

    KEIN HAAR APPROVED!

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    972

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 7:53am


     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Australian culture is similar to British culture in the sense that they both have an acute fear of disorder. You can see this in British laws that have householders arrested for beating up burglars or old men being dragged through the ourts for jabbing chavs with an umbrella. The thought of people taking the law into their own hands invokes a deep fear in the British/Oz psyche, as if that's the only barrier between us and anarchy. Violence has replaced sex as the ultimate taboo.

    Conversely, violent crime is up in the UK and so's gun crime. The system is increasingly slanted towards those who know how to play it (criminals, in other words) and the police is less likely to bother with 'low-level' disorder, whereas a middle aged woman who fights back is usually chucked into the cells in short order. Not even those who save lives are safe.

    Much in the same way that taboos on sex and drugs have only lead to hushed-up child abuse, misery and unregulated criminals supplying porn or smack, so our fear of violence has - paradoxically - left us unequipped to deal with it.

    My own views are like so: there's no greater good if you can't hit back and your home can't be your castle. Criminals only prey on those they know they can abuse. And if one or two burglars get shot or get their skulls caved in - tough ****. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.
    Last edited by Truculent Sheep; 5/01/2006 8:02am at .
  4. Lights Out is offline

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    3,173

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 8:25am

    Join us... or die
     Style: None

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Truculent Sheep
    My own views are like so: there's no greater good if you can't hit back and your home can't be your castle. Criminals only prey on those they know they can abuse. And if one or two burglars get shot or get their skulls caved in - tough ****. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.
    Agreed.

    Aye, something similar happens in Spain. Its like its not a crime to mug sombody, but hitting back is.

    Im considering a criminal career, since it pays so much these days.
  5. danno is offline
    danno's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Shoalhaven, Australia
    Posts
    3,155

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 8:43am

    supporting member
     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Truculent Sheep
    Australian culture is similar to British culture in the sense that they both have an acute fear of disorder. You can see this in British laws that have householders arrested for beating up burglars or old men being dragged through the ourts for jabbing chavs with an umbrella. The thought of people taking the law into their own hands invokes a deep fear in the British/Oz psyche, as if that's the only barrier between us and anarchy. Violence has replaced sex as the ultimate taboo.

    Conversely, violent crime is up in the UK and so's gun crime. The system is increasingly slanted towards those who know how to play it (criminals, in other words) and the police is less likely to bother with 'low-level' disorder, whereas a middle aged woman who fights back is usually chucked into the cells in short order. Not even those who save lives are safe.

    Much in the same way that taboos on sex and drugs have only lead to hushed-up child abuse, misery and unregulated criminals supplying porn or smack, so our fear of violence has - paradoxically - left us unequipped to deal with it.

    My own views are like so: there's no greater good if you can't hit back and your home can't be your castle. Criminals only prey on those they know they can abuse. And if one or two burglars get shot or get their skulls caved in - tough ****. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.
    you make it sound like australia and britain are hell on earth. sometimes the law can be unfair, but in my opinion australia is about as safe and fair as it gets.
  6. Antifa is offline
    Antifa's Avatar

    Sin Dios! Sin amos!

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    YSO
    Posts
    1,204

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 8:52am

    supporting member
     Style: Starting Over... Judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Truculent Sheep
    Australian culture is similar to British culture in the sense that they both have an acute fear of disorder. You can see this in British laws that have householders arrested for beating up burglars or old men being dragged through the ourts for jabbing chavs with an umbrella. The thought of people taking the law into their own hands invokes a deep fear in the British/Oz psyche, as if that's the only barrier between us and anarchy. Violence has replaced sex as the ultimate taboo.

    Conversely, violent crime is up in the UK and so's gun crime. The system is increasingly slanted towards those who know how to play it (criminals, in other words) and the police is less likely to bother with 'low-level' disorder, whereas a middle aged woman who fights back is usually chucked into the cells in short order. Not even those who save lives are safe.

    Much in the same way that taboos on sex and drugs have only lead to hushed-up child abuse, misery and unregulated criminals supplying porn or smack, so our fear of violence has - paradoxically - left us unequipped to deal with it.

    My own views are like so: there's no greater good if you can't hit back and your home can't be your castle. Criminals only prey on those they know they can abuse. And if one or two burglars get shot or get their skulls caved in - tough ****. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.

    What are the chances that this will lead to a change in gun laws there... in a positive direction?
  7. Truculent Sheep is offline

    KEIN HAAR APPROVED!

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    972

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 9:35am


     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Antifa
    What are the chances that this will lead to a change in gun laws there... in a positive direction?
    Probably none. MPs (who have armed police patrolling parliament and live in nice, safe, often gated neighbourhoods) wouldn't pass a bill that lets the citizen fight back. It's against 'principle', you see. Plus all the really blighted neighbourhoods keep voting Labour in anyway*, so why should Tony Blair bother? His government is too busy not deporting violent criminals to care.



    * There are parts of the UK that would vote in a chimpanzee as long as it's got a red rossette on. Why? "Because we've always done 'round here." We get the politicans we deserve as a result.
  8. Truculent Sheep is offline

    KEIN HAAR APPROVED!

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    972

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 9:45am


     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by danno
    you make it sound like australia and britain are hell on earth. sometimes the law can be unfair, but in my opinion australia is about as safe and fair as it gets.
    Not hell, but there's been a noticeable decay in law and order in the last ten years. It's a downward spiral, which is par of the course for the UK, but a shame for a new country like yours. But at least in your case it can be put down to growing pains.
  9. danno is offline
    danno's Avatar

    Light Heavyweight

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Shoalhaven, Australia
    Posts
    3,155

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 10:29am

    supporting member
     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Antifa
    What are the chances that this will lead to a change in gun laws there... in a positive direction?
    positive direction? the majority of australians would not view looser gun laws as a positive direction. this comes down to cultural differences.

    Quote Originally Posted by Truculent Sheep
    Not hell, but there's been a noticeable decay in law and order in the last ten years. It's a downward spiral, which is par of the course for the UK, but a shame for a new country like yours. But at least in your case it can be put down to growing pains.
    your link is about japanese tourists being warned about theft on the gold coast, but you talk as if australian society is going down the toilet. you put it down to growing pains - rediculous.
    Last edited by danno; 5/01/2006 10:35am at .
  10. Plasma is offline
    Plasma's Avatar

    Bullshido Admin

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,042

    Posted On:
    5/01/2006 2:21pm

    supporting memberforum leaderstaff
     Style: 柔術

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Truculent Sheep
    Australian culture is similar to British culture in the sense that they both have an acute fear of disorder. You can see this in British laws that have householders arrested for beating up burglars or old men being dragged through the ourts for jabbing chavs with an umbrella. The thought of people taking the law into their own hands invokes a deep fear in the British/Oz psyche, as if that's the only barrier between us and anarchy. Violence has replaced sex as the ultimate taboo.

    Conversely, violent crime is up in the UK and so's gun crime. The system is increasingly slanted towards those who know how to play it (criminals, in other words) and the police is less likely to bother with 'low-level' disorder, whereas a middle aged woman who fights back is usually chucked into the cells in short order. Not even those who save lives are safe.

    Much in the same way that taboos on sex and drugs have only lead to hushed-up child abuse, misery and unregulated criminals supplying porn or smack, so our fear of violence has - paradoxically - left us unequipped to deal with it.

    My own views are like so: there's no greater good if you can't hit back and your home can't be your castle. Criminals only prey on those they know they can abuse. And if one or two burglars get shot or get their skulls caved in - tough ****. They shouldn't have been there in the first place.
    Awesomely written.
Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst ... 23456 78910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.