5/02/2006 2:08pm, #211Originally Posted by Freakshow
We have a winner!Monkey Ninjas! Attack!
5/02/2006 2:38pm, #212Originally Posted by DerAuslander10852 blocks documentary: arrived
"Joe Lauzon looks like a quiet, Internet guy..." -- Dana White
5/02/2006 2:50pm, #213
Originally Posted by DerAuslander108
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- hfx ns ca na da
I, for one, would like to put peng in a box with a wire wrapped around his pubic bone. A mild shock when he's naughty (omg internal energeez!!!! teh body electric!!). Every now and then throw him a ho-cake for good behaviour.
5/02/2006 4:03pm, #214
Originally Posted by JKDChick
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
Now, if only getting paid the big bucks didn't involve leaving myself no time or energy to get back into serious training. (Working out a couple times a month for fun does not count, in my book.) :icon_sad:
5/02/2006 4:32pm, #215Originally Posted by DerAuslander108
5/02/2006 4:36pm, #216
The irony is that the other 90% is crap by even philosophy standards due to lack of logic.
5/02/2006 4:37pm, #217
Too bad I convinced my brother to switch his major to psych when comp sci wasn't working out for him...:google:
Number of bottles of beer downed by me and my girlfriend within a half hour while playing the Channel 7 "how many times will they say 'snow' game" during the "Blizzard of '06": 3.5 each.
5/02/2006 5:02pm, #218Originally Posted by DerAuslander108
5/02/2006 6:35pm, #219
Waves to Freakshow. . . .
Now if only we could get that clown Kilik to show up. For the rest of you, that guy would last about an hour before various posters would hunt him down and/or the Admins would send him to Trollshido so fast a cliche would happen.
He likes to spam boards with various pseudoscientific crap--like "Qi Gong is Prehistoric!" My favorite was one where he claimed a video of an "invincible Chi Master" who could not be knocked down if he stood on one-foot and held a cup of tea. I wish I was making it up.
Right, for the rest, way back the books I recommended to Peng are very good for explaining why investigators have to apply a scientific method. There are different levels of claim here.
5/03/2006 11:37am, #220
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Durham, NC
I'm not sure we need to insult philosophy while insulting psych. How about we distinguish academic philosophy from new-age metaphysical crap philosophy?