221416 Bullies, 3808 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 21 to 30 of 106
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123 4567 ... LastLast
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. The Buzz is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    42

    Posted On:
    4/04/2006 11:18pm


     Style: BJJ, TKD, MT

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I have to say that hypothesis is cracked out.. UFC is definitely going the way of stand up and that's why I am losing some interest in it. If I wanted to watch Boxing, I would watch boxing, but I now have an appreciation for the grappling and would much rather see a chess game of sweeps and fighting for position and subs that the damn ref standing people up after 10 seconds. Then again Phrost nailed it. BTW most of the stipulations you mentioned seem to favor the striker much more than the grappler.
  2. bodar is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    638

    Posted On:
    4/04/2006 11:46pm


     Style: none currently, ex-TSK

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by The Buzz
    I have to say that hypothesis is cracked out.. UFC is definitely going the way of stand up and that's why I am losing some interest in it. If I wanted to watch Boxing, I would watch boxing, but I now have an appreciation for the grappling and would much rather see a chess game of sweeps and fighting for position and subs that the damn ref standing people up after 10 seconds. Then again Phrost nailed it. BTW most of the stipulations you mentioned seem to favor the striker much more than the grappler.
    They only really stand them up if they are not actively working for position on the ground. They want even the groundfighting to be aggressive. Come on, tell me Diaz VS Sanchez and Stevenson VS Cummo weren't sweet to watch. Crowds want action. The UFC is meeting them halfway. It's a concession which limits grapplers' strategic options, sure, but I think it's what's best for the sport right now.

    Oh yeah, and Jettore and DropthaBomb... you're retarded.
    Last edited by bodar; 4/04/2006 11:49pm at .
  3. RedGonzo is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    205

    Posted On:
    4/04/2006 11:50pm


     Style: BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    As long as they can still slap and pull each others hair, I'm happy.
  4. The Buzz is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    42

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 12:10am


     Style: BJJ, TKD, MT

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by bodar
    They only really stand them up if they are not actively working for position on the ground. They want even the groundfighting to be aggressive. Come on, tell me Diaz VS Sanchez and Stevenson VS Cummo weren't sweet to watch. Crowds want action. The UFC is meeting them halfway. It's a concession which limits grapplers' strategic options, sure, but I think it's what's best for the sport right now.

    Oh yeah, and Jettore and DropthaBomb... you're retarded.
    Iwas being dramatic with the 10 second thing but I get what you are saying and those matches were good. I just believe that without a healthy dose of grappling the UFC will become a kickboxing league, except for the occasional ninja. :)
  5. Dagon Akujin is offline
    Dagon Akujin's Avatar

    "I feel naked I was so distracted by your penis"

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    DETROIT WHAT! (and surrounding upper-class burbs)
    Posts
    1,842

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 1:03am


     Style: Ving Tsun

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Some other stupid rules:

    1. Butting with the head. (favors??? Cut doctors)
    4. Hair pulling. (favors??? strikers/hippies)
    9. Striking to the spine or the back of the head. (favors??? grapplers during a shoot)
    10. Striking downward using the point of the elbow. (favors??? grapplers during a shoot and cut doctors)
    21. Spitting at an opponent. (good rule IMHO)
    23. Holding the ropes or the fence. (stupid rule IMHO)
    24. Using abusive language in the ring or fenced area. (What the ****?!?)

    Dagon Akujin
  6. Meager is offline
    Meager's Avatar

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    979

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 1:16am


     Style: BJJ & MT

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Dagon Akujin
    9. Striking to the spine or the back of the head. (favors??? grapplers during a shoot)
    And strikers when they get their backs taken. It's a hell of alot easier to beat the **** out of the back of someone's head than try for an RNC.
    10. Striking downward using the point of the elbow. (favors??? grapplers during a shoot and cut doctors)
    And strikers when they get mounted/side mounted.

    The only reason there are any rules in the UFC at all outside of no eyegouging, no biting, and no fishhooking is because it would've been shut down years ago otherwsie. All that **** is needed to get it by athletic commisions.
  7. Anna Kovacs is offline
    Anna Kovacs's Avatar

    Spear Sister

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    6,421

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 1:51am

    supporting membersupporting member
     Style: Dancing the Spears

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I think it's cute that the people who criticize the rules of MMA and how they're unfair to strikers never actually compete in it anyways.
  8. Dagon Akujin is offline
    Dagon Akujin's Avatar

    "I feel naked I was so distracted by your penis"

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    DETROIT WHAT! (and surrounding upper-class burbs)
    Posts
    1,842

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 2:37am


     Style: Ving Tsun

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Meager
    And strikers when they get their backs taken.

    And strikers when they get mounted/side mounted.
    Oh, of course. However, I tend to think that those two rules there favor grapplers a little bit more. I mean, during a low shoot, an elbow to the back is about the only defense available short of looking for better position during the takedown. Also, they are defensive moves at that point. Elbowing someone from the side mount/back mount is not the only option, and is really being mainly used to open the person up to more things/damage them (as opposed to protect yourself from being taken down as effectively). I'd say 66/33 split.

    And no, I'm not trying to make an argument for th3 d3ad1y anti-gr@ppl3. I just like to see those moves used and available. I'd use the same argument for small joint moves too. Since they are normally used for escaping, I'd much rather see them allowed. I once had an RNC on a guy who fought in some local toughman competitions and also had about 150 pounds on me. He splayed my toes so I'd have to give up the choke, protect my toes, and reposition. Then he ankle-locked me. I thought that was fucking cool.

    Quote Originally Posted by Meager
    All that **** is needed to get it by athletic commisions.
    Oh, but of course! Still doesn't make them "good rules" as far as I'm concerned though. I like watching elbows.

    Quote Originally Posted by AnnaTrocity
    I think it's cute that the people who criticize the rules of MMA and how they're unfair to strikers never actually compete in it anyways.
    Yes, yes. We know that you are completely bad-ass. Were hockey fans not allowed to question the new NHL rules because they weren't actually players? Or baseball fans not able to say Bonds shouldn't have been using steroids? Should nobody in Detroit have given a **** about this?

    Dagon Akujin
  9. bodar is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    638

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 2:38am


     Style: none currently, ex-TSK

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by AnnaTrocity
    I think it's cute that the people who criticize the rules of MMA and how they're unfair to strikers never actually compete in it anyways.
    Why would they? I mean, it's not fair! :icon_wink
  10. Anna Kovacs is offline
    Anna Kovacs's Avatar

    Spear Sister

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    6,421

    Posted On:
    4/05/2006 2:47am

    supporting membersupporting member
     Style: Dancing the Spears

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Until you compete under a ruleset you have no idea how much that ruleset is actually going to affect your game. I'm a big believer in competing under the most open ruleset one can get, my goal is to one day do an actual all out vale tudo match but the fact is that the rules are not really changing the nature of the fights and a straight up vale tudo match is not going to look paticularly differant from what we see in MMA.

    Moy Tung family Ving Tsun is not suddenly going to become a premier striking art of the UFC if they go back to vale tudo rules. I'm sorry.
Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123 4567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.