Calling bullshido on ground fighting teachers.

**Mjelva** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 11:30am

Originally Posted by LORD ASIA

Sammy?

Everytime I heard the "groundfighting isn't for da street" I immediately translate it to "I don't know dick about groundfighting and I'm too much of a ***** to learn."

Eh...yes and no. I feel better having some groundfighting skills. But most of the time I wouldn't take a fight to the ground on purpose. Getting kicked in the back of the head does suck pretty hard.

This post brought to you by the internet redundancy department of redundancy.

**dramaboy** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 11:39am

Originally Posted by Mjelva

But most of the time I wouldn't take a fight to the ground on purpose.

You make an assumption that you will have a choice.
Which may (most likely will) not be the case.

Tomas

**Locu5** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 12:40pm

Originally Posted by I Choke You

Your effort + gravity = yes.

What if he borrows energy from the uncertainty principle and can move forward in time out of my armbar?

**dramaboy** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 1:06pm

Originally Posted by Locu5

What if he borrows energy from the uncertainty principle and can move forward in time out of my armbar?

On the same note: if you move back in time to help yourself in one of your past fights, is it still a multiple attacker scenario?

Tomas

**Odacon** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 5:46pm

What effects would a black hole have on grappling?

**Gezere** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 5:57pm

Originally Posted by drummerboy

On the same note: if you move back in time to help yourself in one of your past fights, is it still a multiple attacker scenario?

Tomas

The answer is no. It follows the similar principle of going back in time to bang your wife when she is still young and hot its is not cheating.

**Locu5** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 7:02pm

What if he decides his _ing _ung is good enough to ignore the laws of conservation of matter and he splits into a peon and anti-peon pair before returning to a more statistically probable state. Is that multiple attackers?

**Gezere** · Posted On: 1/27/2006 7:18pm

I'm confused. How could a Chunner become an ANTI-peon?

The would mean they were good and that goes against the nature of Chunolgoy which creates a paradox. Chunner=peon, Anti-peon=effective, but Chunner=/=effective..............................

**Hedgehogey** · Posted On: 1/28/2006 4:02am

Observation of the chunner collapses his wave function, forcing him into the most statistically probable state (that of jacking me off slowly). Thus effective, hard contact WC is unobservable because as soon as you look at it, it not only doesn't exist, it never existed before.

**Roidie McDouchebag** · Posted On: 1/28/2006 5:54am

I would rather have dan severn on my side in a fight than hoyce gracie.

I have seen Dan Severn fight, in person, and I've watched a guy I know, from real life, beat the crap out of him. I think by observing Dan, the part of my brain reserved for fighting techniques was irreversibly damaged, and I lost 50 IQ points.