Page 3 of 3 First 123
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,738
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Like any other adult, I was plenty capable of killing someone before I took any MA. There are some pretty basic principles you don't need any MA training to use: smash their head, make holes in them, choke them, etc. That's not to mention what you could do if you walked around armed with an Elmore-esque arsenal.

    I agree a good deal with Kungfools' assertion that a good deal (if not most) of MA related deaths/severeinjuries result from people fucking around in ways untrained and/or sane people probably wouldn't do.

  2. #22
    Darkpaladin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,193
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    20 bucks says it was a no-touch Dim Mak...
    :google:

    Number of bottles of beer downed by me and my girlfriend within a half hour while playing the Channel 7 "how many times will they say 'snow' game" during the "Blizzard of '06": 3.5 each.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    71
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkpaladin
    20 bucks says it was a no-touch Dim Mak...
    I'm afraid of "accidental discharge of chi" deaths. That is why I support Chi Control legislation.

  4. #24
    JKDChick's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    8,131
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Hell, I'm against teaching teenagers to be able to kill. No, 9 and 10 year olds should not be taught lethality. Not every effective self-defense move involves death at the end. Being taught to RUN AWAY is what they should be hearing.
    Monkey Ninjas! Attack!

Page 3 of 3 First 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO