-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Posts
- 410
Posted On:
10/31/2005 7:18pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Posts
- 410
Posted On:
10/31/2005 7:36pm -
Do you eat breakfast?
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Kaka village
- Posts
- 10,658
- Points
- 45,032



Awards:
Posted On:
10/31/2005 7:40pm--
Originally Posted by AthleticGirl
anyone that isn't clearly not white.
EDIT: whoops, quoted wrong thingyRanked #9 internationally at 118lbs by WIKBA http://www.womenkickboxing.com/wikba...rch%202009.htm -
OOOOOOOOOOAAARRGGHH RLY?
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Americastan
- Posts
- 10,026
- Points
- 28,582


Posted On:
10/31/2005 9:11pm--
****** is not the same thing as honkey. I've never seen a white person be insulted when they were seriously called a honkey. I'm talking about a sane white person, not the likes of Rigante. However, I have seen blacks get insulted when they were called *******. That kind of tells you something.
I mean, honkey? That's on par with being called a poo poo head. How you can even compare that to ****** is beyond me.
PL -
Tsun-Derrorist
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 5,306
- Points
- 10,621


Posted On:
10/31/2005 10:05pm--
According to reactions on this thread, some people feel very threatened.
Originally Posted by Camus
Oh come off it. I'm not defending him, i'm riffing off everyone elses reactions. This isn't an abstract ethical arguement, this is about who has power in our society today (hint: not black people).2. I concur; however, on a moral plateau, the fact that no such group exists doesn’t make the message any better reasoned or valid. Also, as a convention, if we allow someone to exclaim the extermination of one race, why not another? Determining whether or there is an actual threat posed can lead to a slippery slope (hehe, I love it I love it).
Fine. Now apply this fact we both agree on to the other points.3. This is true; however, it is not exclusively the domain of white persons to hate and murder blacks. (i.e. Arabs in Sudan)
I'm talking about the common definition, not the dictionary one. If you don't want to use the term racism for prejudice+power, call it something else. Ugafuzzywoozie works.4. I wasn’t aware of that requirement, would you justify that? Racism is racism, whether you are the president of the United States or some blind hick in a moutain cabin, it’s the effects of said racism that vary.
Nevertheless, when we talk about racism, most of the time "institutionalized" is implied to precede the word. If that's too scary, try thinking of it this way: Both blacks and whites can be racist, but only whites have the ability to give their racism real consequences...witness Rigante's screwing over of the next few blacks he meets.
But would it get on CNN? Would Dai-Tenshi's penis retreat from it's position hanging outside the left leg of his boxers until it lodged back in his body cavity at the mere mention?5. I would think that a Jewish person extolling said view would cause quite an uproar, not the least of which would include the Jewish community itself, whom I believe is quite sensitive to this issue, regardless of the race that it applies to.
The attention paid to this comment seems to me to be a cynical attempt to cop out of a real, meaningful analysis of societal, institutionalized racism against blacks (recent events having caused it to almost break out into the public eye again) with a barrage of BLKS CAN BE RASIST TOO! OMG! WTF! BBQ!.
Sure, blacks can be prejudiced, and pro NHB fighters can get KOd. The context, however, is the most important thing in each case. The Statement at the beggining of this thread is not equivalent to threats made by whites against blacks because it is pretty much toothless.
I was intending to lead you onto this point. The ability to slur is a powerful weapon for putting someone "in their place" and a good indicator of relative power levels.6. Words are words and we have slurs for both races, but likely due to the societal structure, history and context of those words, some have more power than others. You already answered this question in your previously stated opinions and I imagine you just intend this to lead the answerer to your same conclusion, which I don’t exactly hold.
Your elaboration on these points would be appreciated.
I was actually enjoying chewing on Rigante. I want him back so I can cum in his ear.
"The only important elements in any society
are the artistic and the criminal,
because they alone, by questioning the society's values,
can force it to change."-Samuel R. Delany
RENDERING GELATINOUS WINDMILL OF DICKS
THIS IS GOING TO BE THE BEST NON-EUCLIDIAN SPLATTERJOUST EVER
It seems that the only people who support anarchy are faggots, who want their pathetic immoral lifestyle accepted by the mainstream society. It wont be so they try to create their own.-Oldman34, friend to all children -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- SF Bay area
- Posts
- 2,681
- Points
- 11,240

Posted On:
10/31/2005 10:19pm--
Your Semantics are Whack.
Originally Posted by hedgehogey
THis is the Spike Lee Definition of Racism. THe call for context is important, but if justice/equality/happiness/rainbows is going to happen then it is incumbant on everyone to call bullshit equaly whenever they see it.
****
Hey Hedgey, if three black guys savagely beat a white guy while calling him 'cracker', is it a hate crime?"You know what I like about you, William? You like guns AND meditation." -
Hi, guys
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- Oslo, Norway
- Posts
- 1,291
- Points
- 6,865

Posted On:
10/31/2005 10:59pm--
I want to dig up a world of trouble and am signing up for the race debate.
I'm white. So I hope this guy never gets serious influence on anything. I'd hate to be exterminated for my race. Just as black people were in previous generations. I don't know if this is his way of creating debate or if he's actually a complete crackpot, but I got an interesting reaction off myself with this clip.
I was actually offended by him saying that white people are *******. Now why in the world would I be offended by him saying that? "dduuuhh, ****** is a racial slur for black people ain't it?" I'd go as far as to say that the word "******" has nothing to do with black people. Like "Jew", doesn't really matter for neo-nazis. It's a word that has a connotation and denotation of hatred in it(Not "Jew" you motherfuckers). Apart from African-american culture adopting the word, trying to dumb it down to make it less effective, it's still intended to describe something that is worth less than animals. The correct word for a black person is Negro. And that simply means black! The hate that goes into "******" is a pretty sick denotation for any group of human beings simply because the pigment of their skin has been changed to be able to withstand extensive exposure to sunlight.
Edit: Actually it's the other way around isn't it? White people have been black once upon a time, and changed to white due to less exposure to the sun. Who'd 'a thunk it?More human than human is our motto. -
Mostly, I just sit here. Mostly.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Washington DC. USA
- Posts
- 7,950
- Points
- 13,287



Posted On:
10/31/2005 11:01pm--
Did you miss my exasperated and angry posting of the little twin nazi singing whores?
Originally Posted by hedgehogey
Also, Aryan Nation and white supremacist groups get coverage all the damn time; is it honestly so hard to believe that having a black guy say the same thing- roughly- wouldn't get attention?
Seriously, what the ****.Last edited by Stick; 10/31/2005 11:13pm at .



Reply With Quote

























Mostly, I just sit here. Mostly.
Posted On:
10/31/2005 6:42pm
Style: MMA