Results 11 to 15 of 15
-
UAAAH!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Hong Kong
- Posts
- 4,082
- Points
- 21,389


Posted On:
9/04/2005 9:23pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- MA, U.S.
- Posts
- 747
Posted On:
9/04/2005 9:53pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 148
- Points
- 2,645

Posted On:
8/13/2006 7:45pm
Style: none--
One thing I don't fully understand is, why wasn't/isn't aliveness an emphasis in TMA?
It seems truly amazing, if not unbelievable, that schools would compromise training for the sake of... tradition? I would assume that the concepts of timing, energy, and motion would by default be an integral part of training regardless of any style, and if a technique is shown not to be effective then what's the point? it seems to be a no brainer.I think that is because when some people start to train Alive, and expose their students to Alive training, they often have to throw out a major portion of the curriculum they learned before. This is because it is shown to not work when applied against a resisting opponent. And Aliveness gauges that very quickly.
It does make me curious what the rational of katas and forms are. Why were they emphasized so much to begin with? I could conceptualize that a few minutes of katas might be useful in the beginning of the introduction stage, is that possible?
Aliveness seems to facilitate convergent evolution of MA. As Thorton said, it reveals what works and what doesn't. I guess I'm curious to the psychology reasons for not wanting change. Perhaps it's too painful to have to admit that what you've devoted your life to is actually ineffective.
but then i've never practiced martial arts in my life. -
OOOOOOOOOOAAARRGGHH RLY?
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Americastan
- Posts
- 10,026
- Points
- 28,582


Posted On:
8/14/2006 12:00am



Reply With Quote












OOOOOOOOOOAAARRGGHH RLY?
Posted On:
9/04/2005 9:19pm
Style: In Transition