What's up with the Martialist?

**daGorilla** · Posted On: 1/10/2006 9:56am

Originally Posted by Phrost

OMG YOU ARE FROM PAX... BAN TIME>>!!

Not. Hell, Phil isn't even banned over here. He's just a coward who can't "objectively" defend his arguments when he can't "fight unfairly".

The reason for any hostiliity here is that there's no point to having discussion that's so hampered by false decorum that it's completely pointless and turns every thread into an exchange between members of a single-minded support group.

If Phil posted here and his posts were as frikkin' longw-winded as his articles (and equally self-indulgent), he should be banned for that. :)

-daGorilla

**Phrost** · Posted On: 1/10/2006 11:11am

Phil has an account here.

http://www.bullshido.net/forums/member.php?u=213

**unpossible** · Posted On: 1/10/2006 11:21am

Originally Posted by LORD ASIA

Fighting is indeed basic, but fighting well and effectively isn't.

.

Hey, does this forum use dot? When you agree with someone and quote them, and then leave just a period to indicate solidarity, or to foil no-quote-only posting rules.

But, yeah. I fight, just not well and effectively yet.

**daigoro** · Posted On: 1/10/2006 12:38pm

Originally Posted by unpossible

.

Hey, does this forum use dot? When you agree with someone and quote them, and then leave just a period to indicate solidarity, or to foil no-quote-only posting rules.

But, yeah. I fight, just not well and effectively yet.

I think "+1" is the preferred shorthand.

**Bugeisha** · Posted On: 1/10/2006 1:22pm

Originally Posted by daigoro

I think "+1" is the preferred shorthand.

...+1

**Kungfoolss** · Posted On: 1/12/2006 2:26am

Originally Posted by daGorilla

If Phil posted here and his posts were as frikkin' longw-winded as his articles (and equally self-indulgent), he should be banned for that. :)

-daGorilla

phil doesn't have the testicles to debate here despite the fantasies and lies he tells himself ->

"I've said before that I've been debating and arguing online since the old UseNet days. I'm very, very good at it. I was never on the debate team in school, but I think I should have been; I think quickly, type almost as fast, I'm good with rhetorical tools, I recognize rhetorical ploys, I'm logical and methodical, I can be humorous when need be, and I enjoy arguing with people. I know that sounds arrogant, but it's also true, so I can't apologize for it or diminish it. I don't try to respond to my critics; I demolish them. I do so easily because they make it easy. Take this incredibly lengthy piece to which I am responding. It's almost completely childish personal attacks (and what little substance it contains we'll address presently). That's not hard at all to ridicule, to refute, and to dismiss – for all you have to do is explain the truth and throw in some counter-insults." phil elmore in 'a woman scorned'

phil's not going to come to a place where he can't control the discussion or find a sympathetic audience. He's a coward.

**Yamabushi** · Posted On: 1/12/2006 6:51am

Everything I need to know about Phil is summed up in the name of his forum. Presumeably he chose Pax Baculum because it means (I think) "Peace of the Stick" in Latin (obviously an allusion to "Talk softly and carry a big stick").

Unfortunately for Phil baculum is used today to refer to the bone found in the penis of most mammals. Phil's forum title thus also translates as the "Peace of the penis bone".

**Shawarma** · Posted On: 1/12/2006 7:07am

Kinda ironic, seeing how he likes to throw around foppish latin frases like a monkey throws feces. If this man was any more full of himself, he'd explode.