-
Modesty forbids more.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
- Posts
- 5,426
- Points
- 21,876

Posted On:
7/22/2005 9:27am--
Oh, for chrissake.
Look, Wing Chun has its merits. But in the majority of WC schools, it lacks a lot of essential striking techniques (such as jab, cross, and hook), as well as a lot of necessary practices (sparring, conditioning, heavy bag work).
MT schools, on average, are much better. People who enter a MT gym usually want to learn how to fight; people who enter a WC school usually want to become Bruce Lee. Different things.That civilisation may not sink,
Its great battle lost,
Quiet the dog, tether the pony
To a distant post;
Our master Caesar is in the tent
Where the maps are spread,
His eyes fixed upon nothing,
A hand under his head.
- W.B. Yeats -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Posts
- 557
Posted On:
7/22/2005 9:31am
Style: WC, Shotokan--
It doesn't take long to go from here.
to here.
Originally Posted by leejunfan
I know where you're coming from but considering the number of people who have come and talked about how badass _ing_un is I can't see there being any point to talking about it on this board without some evidence that it is an effective style.
Originally Posted by leejunfan
In the other thread about subjectivism someone had a little chart of MA rankings
1)Proven
2)Questionable
3)Bullshido
I think _ing_un is sitting squarely in questionable due to its compareably long time to produce proficient self defense to other styles. Having any posts on the subject to convince otherwise without someone with a UFC/PRIDE etc. record or someone going to a throwdown and impressing someone with the actual system is just going to get flamed imho.
edit:changed "fighters" to "self-defense".Last edited by The_Mirth; 7/22/2005 9:52am at .
-
Wing Chun Instructor
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 79
Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:16pm -
.
- Join Date
- Jul 2004
- Location
- On the wrong side of the pond for gong sau
- Posts
- 2,086
Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:30pm
Style: San shou(tai chi) +judo--
Is it that Wing Chun is practiced exclusively by a heriditary class of paper pushers, who should have been burried several centuries ago and that even if you were carrying swords the vast majority of you could be savagely beaten down by a 14 year old with a big stick?
Originally Posted by leejunfan
Those who esteme qi have no strength. ~ Exposition of Insights into the Thirteen Postures Attrib: Wu Yuxiang founder of Wu style tai chi.
Originally Posted by Stickx
-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- CA
- Posts
- 32
Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:59pm
Style: WT and BJJ--
I know WT is hard to explain and most of that is probably due to all the different ways of performing the WT skills. So my question is why do you all try to explain WT? I know I couldnt explain it well and I practice it. Oh and we do heavy bag work and conditioning too, dont remember who said WT doesnt have that, but some of us do.
Plus we spar all the time and occasionaly bring in guys from other styles to spar with, but yeah so far I have noticed that the WT core curriculum is lacking in ground work. Thats why I do BJJ too.
The only really good __ng __unners are in Europe, the best guys here are like the equivalent of a first BB. At most. -
WARNING: BJJ may cause airway obstruction.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Long Island
- Posts
- 3,367
- Points
- 5,348

Posted On:
7/23/2005 12:22am--
This is the exact type of thinking that gets me snickering at WC. What you just described is like the nicest "real life" experience you can possibly get. Try walking down the street at night while a masked attacker comes up behind you and pistol whips you while his friends drag your woman away into a car. You gonna bil jee the barrel of the gun?Its main strength it's that it gives you really useful tools to use in a real "life situation": imo no other arts gives you the opportunity to strike first, quick and effectively as WT. I am thinking about i.e. a situation in which your are standing in a bar and someone suddendly start to get aggressive: with WT you have the best thing to attack before the other has even started moving, and that's key to achieve "victory" in every non-ring situation.
Too many WC schools preach this best effective self defense crap and WC would fare no better in any of those situations than any other system. And you're saying you have to learn it in 6-7 years? Also, analogies are supposed to link two different sets of variables that share the same connection. Katana vs. knife is no way related to MT vs WC.
Let me tell you what I found wrong with WC. The system is based too much on efficiency derived from science and principles. Sure all those principles hold true during its application, but the opponent will be so random that it doesn't matter that all their movements follow a set of rules because although they are bound to certain limitations in the physical realm, they are not inhibited from using the full range of what they are physically allowed in a random and rapid manner.
That's the main problem I had with WC. I wanted to torque my hips. I wanted to commit more weight distribution to help out with power issues.
Bleh on with the flaming already I've been waiting for a _ing _un thread for weeks. -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Posts
- 557
Posted On:
7/23/2005 12:29am
Style: WC, Shotokan--
And a lot of anecdotal evidence of the people involved in this forum implies that the overwhelming majority of morons seem to pick _ing _un as their MA of choice. Then multiply it by the fact that everyone that practices _ing _un seems to disagree with what it is/isn't or how their lineage is superior to everyone elses. I haven't seen a lot of Xing Yi or Mantis guys come on here and talk about how bad ass they are or what not. TKD has a pretty rough rap but this is tempered by the tkd guys who do kickboxing. Since this site is all about put up or shut up _ing _un is going to be written off until it puts up. I really enjoy the _ing _un I'm learning, I think its a blast but the number of morons who come here and talk about it seem to ruin it for anyone wanting to talk about the valuable aspects of the art.
Originally Posted by leejunfan
I'm not even sure what you're asking I just assume you're asking why _ing _un threads are almost instantly flamed and I threw out a guess.



Reply With Quote














He'll flip ya!
Posted On:
7/22/2005 8:50am
Style: Not.....working