-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 126
Posted On:
7/22/2005 5:55am
--
Italy.
Try to explain, speaking of basic punches: strenght comes from the ground/stance, but in a different way than boxing. In boxing for i.e. a cross or a jab you turn the foot, leg, hip torso and shoulder in order to put weight on the punch.
In WT the stance aligns internally shoulder, back, hips, knee and foot and the body just "falls" a little bit upfront: this leads to advancing and putting in any kind of blow the sum of the different body parts effort plus the advancing.
In boxing you have a turning / spiral momentum, maybe helped with an advancing step in WT you have a bottom upwards momentum transferred with a slight advanicng/falling step.
They are both effective if properly trained (problem is boxers work a lot on heavy bags, WTnners usually don't, so the technique comes out shitty), but with the WT one process you need much less movement to put weight on the punch, and no stance preparation at all.
I can assure you that the WT punch if properly done is a really heavy one.
Problem is, again, that many WT practitioners only do "shadow WT", in the air, while you need to train like a boxer in order to make that kind of hit effective. -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 986
- Points
- 7,291

Posted On:
7/22/2005 5:56am -
--
You still have to make the minor adjustment from your ale drinking stance to the aligned stance. You have to judge distance and strike.
I would think the difference in time for a _ing _un guy to go from unprepared to strike would be quite insignificant compared to a boxer (but that is a guess, I haven't measured the times). -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 126
Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:09am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2002
- Posts
- 126
Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:11am -
Badness will not be rewarded
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Location
- Montreal, Canada
- Posts
- 4,841
- Points
- 19,485

Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:21am -
**** you math class
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Pirate Island
- Posts
- 7,047
- Points
- 10,523


Posted On:
7/22/2005 6:22am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 327
Posted On:
7/22/2005 8:22am -
Wing Chun Instructor
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 79
Posted On:
7/22/2005 8:26am
Style: fighting--
I don't understand why someone has to come in here and start comparing mainstream WC to MT, BJJ or anything. It's so tiring and boring. Yeah I know.... I'm not being forced to read this but it still cracks me up. I have said it in the past that a majority of the WC schools out there do not properly train for the street. But this doesn't mean that the system itself sucks.....only the practitioners within certain sectors. There are hardcore WC schools out there that work hard for combat effectiveness. Have we seen them in the dreaded octagon? nope.... but we haven't seen samurai swordsman in there either. Get my meaning?
Anyway...... I think the whole debate is a foolish one. I love WC and because I love it I open my eyes to the entire spectrum of WC/WT schools out there.... and boy do I see a lot of crappy ones. But I also am a martial artist first and formost, and this means I look at everything with wide open eyes and look for their merits. People say to me...."So you are a Wing Chun guy." My answer is "Nope.... I'm a kung fu guy who does Wing Chun." and by Kung Fu (aquired skill) I mean I try to be all around skilled and prepared for the varients of fighting. Stand up or ground..... it's all good to me. THAT is what true martial arts/sciences is all about.



Reply With Quote












Lightweight
Posted On:
7/22/2005 5:44am
Style: Wing Chun