-
Noob: Reloaded
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Montgomery County, PA
- Posts
- 1,105
Posted On:
6/27/2005 12:04am--
Winjitsu..., because, y'know...
...it, like, wins.DIDN'T YOU KNOW?! The Chinese know everything! And they knew it 4,000 years before YOU did!
"Yes. Yes I am. I'm clearly illiterate and dictating this post to a squadron of several dozen trained jumping beans I've coearced into living on my keyboard, each named after a letter or character, which bounce up and down as I call their names." -JohnnyCache -
**** you math class
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Pirate Island
- Posts
- 7,047
- Points
- 10,523


Posted On:
6/27/2005 12:26am--
This is really the only part of the page I read. I'd have to call bullshit on both claims. I can't see mystical ninja kenjutsu being any more different from what a samurai would know of than a school he hasn't come across (And really, that's what the mystical ninja kenjutsu would be), nor were too many samurai interested in the ethics around a fight. The only difference between a samurai fighting a samurai and a samurai fighting a ninja is that the ninja disadvantages himself with a shorter sword, according to this nut.Ninja sword techniques were very unfamiliar to the samurai, who relied on a strict code of ethics for fighting with a sword.
Game point. Winner - the samurai.According to Ninja GrandMaster Masaaki Hatsumi, Ninja swords are shorter than the swords used by samurai. The reason for this was that a larger sword was often too big or heavy, making it difficult for the Ninja to run quickly or hide in small places. -
Ex-ninja
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 1,346
- Points
- 1,709

Posted On:
6/27/2005 12:34am -
Ex-ninja
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 1,346
- Points
- 1,709

Posted On:
6/27/2005 12:52am
Style: Muso Shinden Ryu--
First point -- Bujinkan kenjutsu comes from the Kukishin ryu mainly, which is a samurai school. The Togakure ryu (the only true ninjutsu school that is actively taught in the Bujinkan), has a method of kenjutsu that uses a much shorter sword because peasants were not allowed to carry the same swords as the samurai class. However, the method of kenjutsu isn't all that different. The swords of the Togakure ryu were notoriously lower quality, and so it could be taken as a given that their swords would not be as good of cutters as samurai blades. The method reflects this, and the sword is used more like a close-quarters weapon than a sword. However, these techniques don't resemble a kenjutsu ryuha in the slightest. They're more like "taijustu+sword," so the waza that use the Togakure sword are not taught until one already has a firm basis in taijutsu. It's a safe bet that most of the sword arts learned in a Bujinkan dojo come from the Kukishin (a samurai) school.
Originally Posted by MEGA JESUS-SAN
It's also dependent on the situation as to whether or not a shorter sword would be a disadvantage. Iai is quicker with a shorter blade, and in cramped conditions it becomes an advantage.
Winjutsu is limited in its value, and I say this as a member of the Bujinkan. Particularly, I found the kids section to be full of creative "retellings" of stories Hatsumi-sensei relates in his books and basically propaganda to get kids interested in the Bujinkan, though most dojo refuse to admit people under 18. -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Posts
- 104
Posted On:
6/27/2005 1:05am
Style: Genbukan Ninpo Bugei--
What a retarded thread.
Uh... learning martial arts is bad for a kid? Since when? And when did assassination become part of the ninjutsu curricuulum?You kind of have to wonder about why you'd teach something with that history and purpose to kids unless you were deliberately implementing some kind of self-mockage. I mean, what kind of shitty assasination technique is suitable for family fun?
Its a known fact that Takamatsu sensei got into many fights, throughout china and japan. And I also dont remember anything that resembles a bow and arrows stance in the ciricuulum.OK, last thing. This is really funny, because it's another my-martial-art-has-a-bigger-penis-than-yours story. It's especially funny because it involves a shaolin monk, and it's usually the kungfu guys who tell the biggest stories about how some kungfu master defeated jujitsu/karate/judo/boxing/wrestling/whatever guys with such ease because he had the bow and arrow stance.
Based on what? Are you saying that all the worlds soliders today know of all the other countries training? What about when the british attacked america, they "knew" how to shoot too didnt they? But guess wut, they still got their ass kicked. Plus they had "bigger" weapons too. A shorter sword is a disadvantage? Maybe. But considering ninja at the time had more weapons than just the sword, and the sword itself had hidden weapons in it, im sure its safe to say that the scales were a little more balanced. It wasnt ever a ninja vs a samurai anyways. But thats a whole other topic.This is really the only part of the page I read. I'd have to call bullshit on both claims. I can't see mystical ninja kenjutsu being any more different from what a samurai would know of than a school he hasn't come across (And really, that's what the mystical ninja kenjutsu would be), nor were too many samurai interested in the ethics around a fight. The only difference between a samurai fighting a samurai and a samurai fighting a ninja is that the ninja disadvantages himself with a shorter sword, according to this nut.
A quicker more effective and practical weapon is beaten by a slower and larger one? If you say so....Game point. Winner - the samurai.
-------
All in all, ive seen better attempts at ninja insults on www.generic-website-that-makes-fun-of-ninjas.com
A horrible attempt, and I hope the time you spent masturbating to 5 year old ninja kids was worth the embarassment of looking like a jackass on a public forum. -
**** you math class
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Pirate Island
- Posts
- 7,047
- Points
- 10,523


Posted On:
6/27/2005 1:35am--
Thanks for the info.First point -- Bujinkan kenjutsu comes from the Kukishin ryu mainly, which is a samurai school. The Togakure ryu (the only true ninjutsu school that is actively taught in the Bujinkan), has a method of kenjutsu that uses a much shorter sword because peasants were not allowed to carry the same swords as the samurai class. However, the method of kenjutsu isn't all that different. The swords of the Togakure ryu were notoriously lower quality, and so it could be taken as a given that their swords would not be as good of cutters as samurai blades. The method reflects this, and the sword is used more like a close-quarters weapon than a sword. However, these techniques don't resemble a kenjutsu ryuha in the slightest. They're more like "taijustu+sword," so the waza that use the Togakure sword are not taught until one already has a firm basis in taijutsu. It's a safe bet that most of the sword arts learned in a Bujinkan dojo come from the Kukishin (a samurai) school.
Most swordsman carried a shouto for fighting indoors anyway. Otherwise, longer weapons usually equal teh win, at least to a point.It's also dependent on the situation as to whether or not a shorter sword would be a disadvantage. Iai is quicker with a shorter blade, and in cramped conditions it becomes an advantage.
I never said that samurai knew everything from every other school ever. I said I didn't figure the sword techniques used by ninja could differ that drastically than those from other samurai. If anything, I'd worry most about a samurai who had the free time to practice all day.
Originally Posted by Siphus
And your analogy sucked. There's a huge difference between a personal duel and battle.
"Ninja sword techniques were very unfamiliar to the samurai, who relied on a strict code of ethics for fighting with a sword" looks a lot like "a ninja with a sword could beat a samurai with a sword".Plus they had "bigger" weapons too. A shorter sword is a disadvantage? Maybe. But considering ninja at the time had more weapons than just the sword, and the sword itself had hidden weapons in it, im sure its safe to say that the scales were a little more balanced.
So a ninja never even had to defend himself against rounin bandits? In the history of Japan?It wasnt ever a ninja vs a samurai anyways. But thats a whole other topic.
quicker =/ more effective and practical. A knife is faster than a sword, but that doesn't mean I'd be willing to tanto my way through class.A quicker more effective and practical weapon is beaten by a slower and larger one? If you say so.... -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Posts
- 104
Posted On:
6/27/2005 1:45am
Style: Genbukan Ninpo Bugei--
If the knife had blinding powder in the scabbard, and you had 5 extra trowing knives, other misc tools, and the immense training in disarming and surviving fights against armed and armored attackers, then yeah, u might have a good chance.
Originally Posted by MEGA JESUS-SAN
-
Ex-ninja
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Houston, Texas
- Posts
- 1,346
- Points
- 1,709

Posted On:
6/27/2005 1:45am
Style: Muso Shinden Ryu--
Generally, it could be taken as a given that the samurai would be better educated, better trained, and better armed than the ninja. Also, the samurai would have access to a better diet and healthier living conditions than the ninja. The ninja was no match for the samurai generally in fair combat. This is why ninjutsu techniques are rarely, if ever fair, and often rely on the advantage of superior numbers or superior familiarity with the terrain.
It's a modern myth that ninjutsu is a combat art. Ninjutsu, and especially ninpo, are not fighting arts. Taijutsu is a fighting art. Kenjutsu is a fighting art. Ninjutsu is more about how to outsmart and out-manuever your enemy. Instead of standing your ground and dueling that samurai chasing you, you'd just as easily rather throw some caltrops down in the road, hide in the bushes, and toss some explosives at him... if you were found out. Most ninjutsu techniques focus on you NOT being seen by the people you are spying on, and getting out of the territory without having to resort to combat.
And then, when you examine Togakure ryu techniques, you find that the techniques are usually a form of misdirection. For instance, you might fake high with a punch only to turn it into a stomp to the outside of someone's kneecap. It's meant for an inferior warrior to stand a fighting chance against a superior one by means of trickery and the use of "cheating aids" like blinding powder and hidden weapons.
So, when people brag about the fighting prowess of ninjutsu, they're terminally confused. There are lots of arts in the x-kans which are good fighting arts, but these are generally not the ninpo ryuha. The Kukishin ryu has excellent weapons training, and good grappling training. The Gyokko and Koto ryu focus on striking. Shinden Fudo ryu is a very tough and fast style that combines both dakentaijutsu and jutaijutsu, and the Takagi Yoshin ryu of jujutsu is supposedly the style used to train Imperial bodyguards. These schools make up the majority of the combat techniques you learn in the Bujinkan, not the Togakure ryu. The Togakure ryu is all about specialized weapons, trickery, strategy, and misdirection. -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Posts
- 104
Posted On:
6/27/2005 1:46am



Reply With Quote











...is THE PENETRATOR
Posted On:
6/27/2005 12:01am
Style: German longsword, .45 ACP
Winjitsu.com's NINJA KIDS!!