I positive repped Afronaut for his post which was more specific and better, then my comment. Despite being a pro, I have to admit I've never read Title 17. These all sound like reasonable defenses, the question is how generously a federal court will construe them.
Originally Posted by afronaut
Add that avatar someone made of him. It's totally an original caricature, and shouldn't be a problem. . .and we all know who it is!
Originally Posted by Phrost
In the case of copyright for images. . .would that 10% change thing apply as it does to trademarks & logos?
Originally Posted by Samuel Browning
Don't know what you mean... :angel10:
Originally Posted by Meex
Imports from Japan, Shipping Worldwide! Art Junkie, Scramble, BJJ Spirits, Reversal...
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO