11/28/2004 4:14pm, #11
11/28/2004 4:24pm, #12
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
You don't see these techs in BJJ and wrestling because they're GRAPPLING styles. GRAPPLING MEANS NO-HITTING. BAJI = HITTING STUFF.sudo make me a sandwich!
11/28/2004 4:39pm, #13Originally Posted by locu5
But putting him on ignore denies you so much comic relief.
11/28/2004 4:53pm, #14
Are you trying to say BAJI ISN'T about HITTING Stuff?
God.. and the hopes I had for you.. all shattered... :::SOB:::::let's talk about why fat-fu shall we?
11/28/2004 5:08pm, #15
Baji is different from other arts and has no relationship whatsoever to them.
Baji is about total anihilation. Not hitting, "smashing". That's where his theory is flawed. He forgot to take into account how actually some arts smash and others hit. Even his shuai jiao theory has this problem. See the mongolians have developed a grappling styles while the Baoding Shuaoi jiao has taken a completely different evolutionary and gone the throwing route.
Then we could look at his comparison between shaolin and bagua. Everyone knows that Shaolin stylists copy aniumals but the arts of Wudang such as Bagua and Taiji copy porn stars and use their jing instead of regular muscular strength. They fajin all over you.
11/29/2004 4:47am, #16
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Papua New Guinea
Apart from some therapuetic benefits, the chinese arts offer little to someone looking to learn how to fight.
11/29/2004 4:55am, #17
Notice how most of those styles suck, too. Concidence?