Posted On:11/28/2004 4:14pm
Style: BJJ - Homeland Security
File photo of serious harm
Didn't so much Fall as Saunter Vaguely Downwards
Posted On:11/28/2004 4:24pm
Style: Ex-TKD, BJJ, Muay Thai
You don't see these techs in BJJ and wrestling because they're GRAPPLING styles. GRAPPLING MEANS NO-HITTING. BAJI = HITTING STUFF.
sudo make me a sandwich!
Posted On:11/28/2004 4:39pm
Style: Chinese Kung Fu
Originally Posted by locu5
guys, i think seriuos harm was just talking to himself here, i see no need to respond.
how ELSE are you supposed to interpret 4 consecutive posts on his own thread before anyone else has responded.
But putting him on ignore denies you so much comic relief.
Fighting evil and upholding justice in blue silk pajamas baby!
Bah!!! Puny Humans.
I got an axe to grind
Posted On:11/28/2004 4:53pm
Are you trying to say BAJI ISN'T about HITTING Stuff?
God.. and the hopes I had for you.. all shattered... :::SOB:::::
let's talk about why fat-fu shall we?
Posted On:11/28/2004 5:08pm
Baji is different from other arts and has no relationship whatsoever to them.
Baji is about total anihilation. Not hitting, "smashing". That's where his theory is flawed. He forgot to take into account how actually some arts smash and others hit. Even his shuai jiao theory has this problem. See the mongolians have developed a grappling styles while the Baoding Shuaoi jiao has taken a completely different evolutionary and gone the throwing route.
Then we could look at his comparison between shaolin and bagua. Everyone knows that Shaolin stylists copy aniumals but the arts of Wudang such as Bagua and Taiji copy porn stars and use their jing instead of regular muscular strength. They fajin all over you.
Posted On:11/29/2004 4:47am
Apart from some therapuetic benefits, the chinese arts offer little to someone looking to learn how to fight.
Posted On:11/29/2004 4:55am
Style: In Transition
Notice how most of those styles suck, too. Concidence?
Articles and Reviews
Tools and Info