The fact so many seperate styles are related

**Shuma-Gorath** · Posted On: 11/28/2004 3:14pm

File photo of serious harm

**IzzyDaHedgehog** · Posted On: 11/28/2004 3:24pm

You don't see these techs in BJJ and wrestling because they're GRAPPLING styles. GRAPPLING MEANS NO-HITTING. BAJI = HITTING STUFF.

**Omar** · Posted On: 11/28/2004 3:39pm

Originally Posted by locu5

guys, i think seriuos harm was just talking to himself here, i see no need to respond.

how ELSE are you supposed to interpret 4 consecutive posts on his own thread before anyone else has responded.

But putting him on ignore denies you so much comic relief.

**The Crack Taoist** · Posted On: 11/28/2004 3:53pm

Omar..
Are you trying to say BAJI ISN'T about HITTING Stuff?

God.. and the hopes I had for you.. all shattered... :::SOB:::::

**Omar** · Posted On: 11/28/2004 4:08pm

No.

Baji is different from other arts and has no relationship whatsoever to them.

Baji is about total anihilation. Not hitting, "smashing". That's where his theory is flawed. He forgot to take into account how actually some arts smash and others hit. Even his shuai jiao theory has this problem. See the mongolians have developed a grappling styles while the Baoding Shuaoi jiao has taken a completely different evolutionary and gone the throwing route.

Then we could look at his comparison between shaolin and bagua. Everyone knows that Shaolin stylists copy aniumals but the arts of Wudang such as Bagua and Taiji copy porn stars and use their jing instead of regular muscular strength. They fajin all over you.