Page 1 of 28 1234511 ... Last
  1. #1
    Wounded Ronin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Style
    German longsword, .45 ACP
    4
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    Trump campaign collusion with Russia

    So, multiple news sources, now including the National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...il-revelations), have now reported that Donald Trump Jr. self-admittedly colluded with the Kremlin to try and undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign.

    However, in spite of this, some voters continue to support Donald Trump: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...dal/474789001/

    I am having difficulty understanding this. My hunch is that if, say, Bernie Sanders had been proven to have been collaborating with the Kremlin in order to take down HRC, there would be a lot more condemnation from the individuals that continue to support Trump. I read the USA Today article to try and understand the thinking behind the continued Trump support, but came up with more questions than answers.

    The region, filled with rolling hills and woods near the Alabama border, is still proud of Trump, said Wayne County Republican Party Chairwoman Stephanie Pearson.

    “I probably am a bigger supporter of him. I have a greater respect and admiration for him and his office,” said Pearson.

    Pearson, who works down the road from Waynesboro as city clerk of Collinwood, said Trump should tone down the personal attacks on Twitter.

    But she’s more ashamed of the way Democrats, the media and opponents have attacked her president, and she is disappointed in congressional Republicans for not doing more to help Trump.

    She applauded Donald Trump Jr. for releasing his emails about a meeting with a Russian attorney in the midst of the campaign against Clinton.

    There’s very little that would change her mind about Trump.

    “I don’t know what he would have to do … I guess maybe kill someone. Just in cold blood,” Pearson said.
    I have difficulty understanding statements like the above. How can anyone support a politician unconditionally? Almost by definition, that means that the politician doesn't need to keep any promises made to you in order to get your vote and donations.

    Speaking of promises, another thing I don't understand is why some people seemed to think that Trump would be more trustworthy than Clinton regarding campaign promises, when he made inherently nonsensical promises. For example, he simultaneously promised to restore US manufacturing, but also to kick off a tariff trade war. These would be mutually antagonistic policy positions. I would think that logically, one would hear these promises, and then immediately decide that at least one of them would be nonsense, since you couldn't do both at once. The statements themselves, being self-contradictory, are already a lie of sorts, since at most only one can be acted on in a meaningful way. How does someone making both statements generate enthusiasm, rather than confusion and disengagement?

    Jackson voted for Trump, the first Republican he’s ever voted for, not because he disliked President Barack Obama, but because he thinks the Democratic Party did not do enough to improve the economy.

    “I saw (Trump) as a person I could relate to. In business, it doesn’t matter if you’re a Republican or Democrat. You’ve got to make it,” Jackson said.
    This one's interesting to me. It does make sense that small business owners might relate to Trump if they see him as a business man. I believe that in his home town of New York City, Trump is not seen as a businessman. Rather, he is seen as a flamboyant con man who skated by on his father's money. Witness his portrayal on the old Simpsons episode where his presidency is presented as a comedic hypothetical. This could explain why small business owners who don't have ties to New York City might relate to Trump on some level, since they don't necessarily know of his past reputation.

    But her friend and former county Democratic Party Chairwoman Peggy Monroe said Republican support won’t wane. Monroe, 68, said there’s an old story about Collinwood: In the early 1900s, a Baptist preacher rode through town telling everyone to vote Republican, and they have ever since.

    “They are born and raised Republican here. They are taught from the time they can talk that’s the way they’re going to vote. They bring their children to the polls … and they better vote Republican.”
    Again, this is bizarre to me. Why wouldn't people try to think from the framework of negotiating with their politicians, instead of blind "free" support?

    Mike Mitchell agrees the president probably won’t lose support from many in the county, noting Trump’s background in business, not politics.

    “Whatever he does salesman-wise or crooked-wise is nothing compared to what the politicians have done,” Mitchell said. “I don’t know anybody that would change their mind.”

    Mitchell voted for Trump because Obama’s changes to health care didn’t help him.

    Talk of Russia, special prosecutors and election tampering won’t change his mind. But he might support someone else in the next election if Trump can’t deliver on health care.

    Looking down at a notebook filled with numbers, Mike’s wife, Debbie, said it’s tough to care about Russian collusion when your husband needs new knees.

    “We’ve lost everything, pretty much,” said Debbie Mitchell. “We can’t afford health care, period. We didn’t qualify for Obamacare, we didn’t qualify for (Medicaid), and we can’t afford to buy health insurance. We’re the ones that fall through the cracks.”

    Asked if the situation made her nervous, she laughed.

    “Nervous? We’ve been doing it for years. We passed nervous awhile back.”
    Health care has been a big challenge in the US for a long time and I think the people quoted are right to want health care reform. The part that I don't understand is why they believe that Donald Trump, who hasn't really dealt with healthcare before, would do a better job than HRC, who has been involved with healthcare since the 90s. Considering the complexity of the US healthcare system, the idea that an amateur (let alone an amateur known for not doing his homework or conscientious preparation for anything of importance) could jump in and do a good job seems counter intuitive.


    In conclusion, it seems like the Trump Jr. collusion with the Kremlin is one of the most clear cut cases in US history of a campaign colluding with a foreign power to upset a major US election.

    And yet, the response seems muted from the electorate. When I try to find out why by reading interviews and articles, there is no clear answer, or at least no answer that seems to make logical sense.

    In US politics, people often like to talk about patriotism. People have said things like "I think Donald Trump loves his country". And yet, when there is proof of collusion with a foreign power, there is no emotional response. There is no urge to protect democracy and no concern about the stability of democratic institutions.

    Does anyone have any commentary or explanation? A narrative to make sense of it all?
    Best Vietnam War music video I've ever seen put together by a vet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDY8raKsdfg

  2. #2
    BKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry, Idaho
    Posts
    16,616
    Style
    Kodokan Judo/BJJ
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Wounded Ronin View Post
    So, multiple news sources, now including the National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...il-revelations), have now reported that Donald Trump Jr. self-admittedly colluded with the Kremlin to try and undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign.

    However, in spite of this, some voters continue to support Donald Trump: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...dal/474789001/

    I am having difficulty understanding this. My hunch is that if, say, Bernie Sanders had been proven to have been collaborating with the Kremlin in order to take down HRC, there would be a lot more condemnation from the individuals that continue to support Trump. I read the USA Today article to try and understand the thinking behind the continued Trump support, but came up with more questions than answers.



    I have difficulty understanding statements like the above. How can anyone support a politician unconditionally? Almost by definition, that means that the politician doesn't need to keep any promises made to you in order to get your vote and donations.

    Speaking of promises, another thing I don't understand is why some people seemed to think that Trump would be more trustworthy than Clinton regarding campaign promises, when he made inherently nonsensical promises. For example, he simultaneously promised to restore US manufacturing, but also to kick off a tariff trade war. These would be mutually antagonistic policy positions. I would think that logically, one would hear these promises, and then immediately decide that at least one of them would be nonsense, since you couldn't do both at once. The statements themselves, being self-contradictory, are already a lie of sorts, since at most only one can be acted on in a meaningful way. How does someone making both statements generate enthusiasm, rather than confusion and disengagement?



    This one's interesting to me. It does make sense that small business owners might relate to Trump if they see him as a business man. I believe that in his home town of New York City, Trump is not seen as a businessman. Rather, he is seen as a flamboyant con man who skated by on his father's money. Witness his portrayal on the old Simpsons episode where his presidency is presented as a comedic hypothetical. This could explain why small business owners who don't have ties to New York City might relate to Trump on some level, since they don't necessarily know of his past reputation.



    Again, this is bizarre to me. Why wouldn't people try to think from the framework of negotiating with their politicians, instead of blind "free" support?



    Health care has been a big challenge in the US for a long time and I think the people quoted are right to want health care reform. The part that I don't understand is why they believe that Donald Trump, who hasn't really dealt with healthcare before, would do a better job than HRC, who has been involved with healthcare since the 90s. Considering the complexity of the US healthcare system, the idea that an amateur (let alone an amateur known for not doing his homework or conscientious preparation for anything of importance) could jump in and do a good job seems counter intuitive.


    In conclusion, it seems like the Trump Jr. collusion with the Kremlin is one of the most clear cut cases in US history of a campaign colluding with a foreign power to upset a major US election.

    And yet, the response seems muted from the electorate. When I try to find out why by reading interviews and articles, there is no clear answer, or at least no answer that seems to make logical sense.

    In US politics, people often like to talk about patriotism. People have said things like "I think Donald Trump loves his country". And yet, when there is proof of collusion with a foreign power, there is no emotional response. There is no urge to protect democracy and no concern about the stability of democratic institutions.

    Does anyone have any commentary or explanation? A narrative to make sense of it all?
    There are plenty of commentaries on line regarding the situation.

    From what I can tell, Trump Jr. was a naive idiot to get sucked into that situation, and for not coming out sooner with the incident.

    Further, it doesn't look like he committed any crimes in having the meeting.

    In fact, there is a whole 'nother narrative developing regarding context for the meeting. True or not, or how much true, I don't know at this point. Probably never will, either....
    Falling for Judo since 1980

    "You are wrong. Why? Because you move like a pregnant yak and talk like a spazzing 'I train UFC' noob." -DCS

    "The best part of getting you worked up is your backpack full of irony and lies." -It Is Fake

    "Banning BKR is like kicking a Quokka. It's foolishness of the first order." - Raycetpfl

  3. #3
    1bad65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    austin, tx
    Posts
    3,116
    Style
    boxing, gjj
    2
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BKR View Post
    There are plenty of commentaries on line regarding the situation.

    From what I can tell, Trump Jr. was a naive idiot to get sucked into that situation, and for not coming out sooner with the incident.

    Further, it doesn't look like he committed any crimes in having the meeting.

    In fact, there is a whole 'nother narrative developing regarding context for the meeting. True or not, or how much true, I don't know at this point. Probably never will, either....
    This is my feelings on it so far.

    Remember, it's been an almost weekly/daily occurrence since the inauguration that the Democrats/press have came out with the latest supposed smoking gun saying 'We got Trump this time!' only to look like Wile E Coyote endlessly chasing the Trump roadrunner.

    I take all these conspiracy theories with a grain of salt, until I see actual proof of collusion.

    Which brings me to this.....

    Quote Originally Posted by Wounded Ronin View Post
    So, multiple news sources, now including the National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...il-revelations), have now reported that Donald Trump Jr. self-admittedly colluded with the Kremlin to try and undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign.
    I believe he's admitted to meeting an attorney who once represented a Russian in a tax case, but where did 'Trump Jr admit to colluding with the Kremlin'?

    That's a serious charge, and one that's VERY bad if true.

    So please source where he did exactly as was charged above. Thx
    A succubus is a Lilin-demon in female form, or supernatural entity in folklore that appears in dreams and takes the form of a woman in order to seduce men, usually through sexual activity. Religious traditions hold that repeated sexual activity with a succubus may result in the deterioration of health or mental state, or even in death.

  4. #4
    BKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry, Idaho
    Posts
    16,616
    Style
    Kodokan Judo/BJJ
    2
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    All this talk of "colluding"....as if it's some sort of crime to talk to people, even, gasp, foreigners.

    I was thinking about this last night while trying to lift my arm to eat my dinner after BJJ practice...why, I don't know...oh, yeah, OCD...

    I imagined a situation in which Putin just came out and said, during the last presidential campaign "I personally endorse Donald Trump (or HRC, or Bernie) for President", and then gave reasons.

    Then lets say he made personal campaign contributions, and let's say even came over and campaigned. Imagine that Trump (or whomever) welcomed the support, and made campaign promises regarding new, positive cooperation with Russia, etc., on Ukraine, Syria, etc. Then, lo and behold, Putin releases info on other candidates that is negative...

    So, collusion? Any crimes committed ? All above-board and in the open...

    Anyway, I think there may be some sort of law against that sort of behavior, but who would be prosecuted, Putin?

    This whole thing is about the Democrats (and probably some Republicans) stymieing Trump and his "agenda", to make gains in 2018 mid-terms and then 2020 elections.

    Politics as usual...
    Falling for Judo since 1980

    "You are wrong. Why? Because you move like a pregnant yak and talk like a spazzing 'I train UFC' noob." -DCS

    "The best part of getting you worked up is your backpack full of irony and lies." -It Is Fake

    "Banning BKR is like kicking a Quokka. It's foolishness of the first order." - Raycetpfl

  5. #5
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    13,563
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    3
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    You guys are about to see some magical **** out in the wilds of real life mediaworld and the interland.

    Just remember "collusion" is not a crime. Treason, witness intimidation, sexual assault, fraud, money laundering, lying on government documents, financial transactions with sanctioned entities, and lying under oath are crimes.
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost55 View Post
    Violence is pretty uncommon in clubs in this area, and the dude didn't seem particularly hostile up until the moment he slapped me.
    “I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.”
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by WFMurphyPhD View Post
    Slamming the man in the bottom position from time to time keeps everybody on their toes and discourages butt scooting stupidity.

  6. #6
    BackFistMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sinsinnatti Oh Hi Ho
    Posts
    13,563
    Style
    all things in Moderation
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BKR View Post
    All this talk of "colluding"....as if it's some sort of crime to talk to people, even, gasp, foreigners.

    I was thinking about this last night while trying to lift my arm to eat my dinner after BJJ practice...why, I don't know...oh, yeah, OCD...

    I imagined a situation in which Putin just came out and said, during the last presidential campaign "I personally endorse Donald Trump (or HRC, or Bernie) for President", and then gave reasons.

    Then lets say he made personal campaign contributions, and let's say even came over and campaigned. Imagine that Trump (or whomever) welcomed the support, and made campaign promises regarding new, positive cooperation with Russia, etc., on Ukraine, Syria, etc. Then, lo and behold, Putin releases info on other candidates that is negative...

    So, collusion? Any crimes committed ? All above-board and in the open...

    Anyway, I think there may be some sort of law against that sort of behavior, but who would be prosecuted, Putin?

    This whole thing is about the Democrats (and probably some Republicans) stymieing Trump and his "agenda", to make gains in 2018 mid-terms and then 2020 elections.

    Politics as usual...
    I present evidence A.1
    Quote Originally Posted by ghost55 View Post
    Violence is pretty uncommon in clubs in this area, and the dude didn't seem particularly hostile up until the moment he slapped me.
    “I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out.”
    BILL HICKS,
    1961-1994

    Quote Originally Posted by WFMurphyPhD View Post
    Slamming the man in the bottom position from time to time keeps everybody on their toes and discourages butt scooting stupidity.

  7. #7
    Permalost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    14,366
    Style
    street paddleboarding
    2
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I think its a bit naive to think that a national election of a powerful nation will have no outside influence. Not to say that collusion isn't real or bad, but that the idea of a modern insular democracy is a myth.

  8. #8
    Wounded Ronin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    7,357
    Style
    German longsword, .45 ACP
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post

    I believe he's admitted to meeting an attorney who once represented a Russian in a tax case, but where did 'Trump Jr admit to colluding with the Kremlin'?

    That's a serious charge, and one that's VERY bad if true.

    So please source where he did exactly as was charged above. Thx
    Oh, what I meant by that was his release of emails in which he wanted to meet with a "Russian government attorney" in order to get damaging information on HRC.

    http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/11/politi...ics/index.html

    The President's son and namesake, in a sensational revelation that significantly escalated the drama over alleged Russian election meddling incessantly battering the White House, may have provided the flames by releasing an email chain that detailed his expectations of getting Kremlin dirt on Hillary Clinton in a meeting he had with a Russian lawyer last year.

    Donald Trump Jr.'s shocking move is more than another lurch in the storyline of alleged election interference that has utterly consumed American politics. The emails appear to add important context to the question at the center of the entire controversy: Was the Trump campaign willing to cooperate with Russia to use and highlight information damaging to the Democratic presidential nominee? What did the President know? What did his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, know?

    The documents revealed that Trump Jr. agreed to meet a "Russian government attorney" last summer after receiving an email offering him "very high level and sensitive information" that would "incriminate" Clinton.

    An email from publicist Rob Goldstone offered Trump Jr. a sit down that promised the handover of information as "part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump."
    Best Vietnam War music video I've ever seen put together by a vet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDY8raKsdfg

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,355
    2
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I'm not sure if "collusion" is American legalse for "something you can actually be penalised for", but as far as the actual meaning of the word is concerned I frankly don't believe that anyone can deny that yes, the Trump campaign cooperated with the Russian government for the purpose of winning the US election.

    I'm also not sure why Republicans do not seem to have any kind of problem with this.

    Actually, scratch that, it's actually hilariously obvious why.

  10. #10
    Bneterasedmynam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    4,653
    2
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Wounded Ronin View Post
    So, multiple news sources, now including the National Review (http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...il-revelations), have now reported that Donald Trump Jr. self-admittedly colluded with the Kremlin to try and undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign.

    However, in spite of this, some voters continue to support Donald Trump: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...dal/474789001/

    I am having difficulty understanding this. My hunch is that if, say, Bernie Sanders had been proven to have been collaborating with the Kremlin in order to take down HRC, there would be a lot more condemnation from the individuals that continue to support Trump. I read the USA Today article to try and understand the thinking behind the continued Trump support, but came up with more questions than answers.



    I have difficulty understanding statements like the above. How can anyone support a politician unconditionally? Almost by definition, that means that the politician doesn't need to keep any promises made to you in order to get your vote and donations.

    Speaking of promises, another thing I don't understand is why some people seemed to think that Trump would be more trustworthy than Clinton regarding campaign promises, when he made inherently nonsensical promises. For example, he simultaneously promised to restore US manufacturing, but also to kick off a tariff trade war. These would be mutually antagonistic policy positions. I would think that logically, one would hear these promises, and then immediately decide that at least one of them would be nonsense, since you couldn't do both at once. The statements themselves, being self-contradictory, are already a lie of sorts, since at most only one can be acted on in a meaningful way. How does someone making both statements generate enthusiasm, rather than confusion and disengagement?



    This one's interesting to me. It does make sense that small business owners might relate to Trump if they see him as a business man. I believe that in his home town of New York City, Trump is not seen as a businessman. Rather, he is seen as a flamboyant con man who skated by on his father's money. Witness his portrayal on the old Simpsons episode where his presidency is presented as a comedic hypothetical. This could explain why small business owners who don't have ties to New York City might relate to Trump on some level, since they don't necessarily know of his past reputation.



    Again, this is bizarre to me. Why wouldn't people try to think from the framework of negotiating with their politicians, instead of blind "free" support?



    Health care has been a big challenge in the US for a long time and I think the people quoted are right to want health care reform. The part that I don't understand is why they believe that Donald Trump, who hasn't really dealt with healthcare before, would do a better job than HRC, who has been involved with healthcare since the 90s. Considering the complexity of the US healthcare system, the idea that an amateur (let alone an amateur known for not doing his homework or conscientious preparation for anything of importance) could jump in and do a good job seems counter intuitive.


    In conclusion, it seems like the Trump Jr. collusion with the Kremlin is one of the most clear cut cases in US history of a campaign colluding with a foreign power to upset a major US election.

    And yet, the response seems muted from the electorate. When I try to find out why by reading interviews and articles, there is no clear answer, or at least no answer that seems to make logical sense.

    In US politics, people often like to talk about patriotism. People have said things like "I think Donald Trump loves his country". And yet, when there is proof of collusion with a foreign power, there is no emotional response. There is no urge to protect democracy and no concern about the stability of democratic institutions.

    Does anyone have any commentary or explanation? A narrative to make sense of it all?
    Haven't you been keeping up with the Trump threads?? His supporters will back him NO MATTER WHAT. As I said once before he could stomp a puppy to death on live tv and his supporters would just deflect with something about Hilary.

Page 1 of 28 1234511 ... Last

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in