6/06/2013 6:00pm, #11
@Machete: I get the feeling you TOTALLY WOULD on downright anything, as long as there are some holes and a heartbeat.
And hell, I'm not even sure about the heartbeat.
Last edited by Tranquil Suit; 6/06/2013 6:08pm at .
(button in upper right corner) Settings> (left menu under My Account) General Settings > in Thread Display Options > Number of Posts to Show Per Page: 40
6/08/2013 5:30am, #12
- Join Date
- May 2011
There always has been two separate definitions of beautiful. The male version of beautiful is what you see in playboy: healthy, athletic, hot sexy girls, men wanted.
The second one, is this gay dominated model\ fashion world, were a skinny tall fragile girl is considered beautiful.
IMO and most men, an athletic healthy young women is attractive, and yes usually it means relatively low body fat percentage, and some muscle mass.
I find that most women tennis players have the "perfect legs"..
6/08/2013 8:07am, #13
6/10/2013 7:25pm, #14
I don't understand the attraction to superskinny models that look like 14 year old boys with breasts.
A superskinny model that looks like a 14 year old with breasts and 6 pack abs doesn't seem to be much of an improvement.
Human attractiveness seems to be based on ratio, more than anything else. I'm lazy. Ask the Google about Hip to waist ratio and the golden ratio in human physiology.Originally Posted by Canuckyokushin
6/13/2013 9:06pm, #15