Thread: 'Let's Talk About Fallon Fox.
4/24/2013 12:58am, #391
Try to guess who has the "unfair advantage" here.
"The only important elements in any society
are the artistic and the criminal,
because they alone, by questioning the society's values,
can force it to change."-Samuel R. Delany
RENDERING GELATINOUS WINDMILL OF DICKS
THIS IS GOING TO BE THE BEST NON-EUCLIDIAN SPLATTERJOUST EVER
It seems that the only people who support anarchy are faggots, who want their pathetic immoral lifestyle accepted by the mainstream society. It wont be so they try to create their own.-Oldman34, friend to all children
4/24/2013 12:59am, #392
4/24/2013 1:44am, #393
4/24/2013 3:30am, #394
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Chicago / Michigan
Have the drugs (or training with Omega) damaged your frontal lobe so badly that you can't read at a seventh-grade level any longer? There is nothing in the article about a death threat, you semi-literate twerp.
Here is the portion quoting Hyatt's description of Fox's statements. Where do you see a death threat?
As you’d all know though, I have a chip on my shoulder myself & am very stubborn, so I gladly partook in the silent staring contest for a minute or so until I inquired as to why she was actually staring at me. Fallon replied with “I’ll do what I want”, to which I laughed, said she is a joke & went back to my Facebook training in preparation of the nights [sic] contest.
I can’t remember exactly what Fallon then said, but it was along the lines of “I’m coming down there” in an angrier tone & as she went to put on her jacket, Invicta Fighting Championships matchmaker Janet Martin came out of an elevator & started talking to me. When I looked back up, Fallon & her friend were gone.
The article also notes that she tried to apologize to Hyatt later.
I'm not even a fan of Fox, but I find it pretty amusing that she has you so worked up that you can't make a three-sentence post about her without saying something dishonest and moronic. Trespassing, though, that's pretty damned serious.
4/24/2013 4:06am, #395
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Chicago / Michigan
1. The people involved in racist and anti-gay comments in this thread are a staff member and a member who is at least perceived as being treated as having special status by staff / mods. So, it may be pretty hard to convince people that they want to start neg-repping someone known to hand out 99-point infractions or that they should get into conflict with a member who has repeatedly claimed access to others' private message sent to staff through inside connections, etc.
2. The typical response to a neg-rep vote from many members seems to be a storm of neg-repping unconnected posts. So, the method you propose seems likely to generate "rep-wars" in response to people trying to "self-moderate."
3. The neg-rep arrow function is being used for several different things here. It can mean "I strongly disagree." (The meaning the words "Hell no!" seem to give it.) It can mean "This is a low content / shitty post" or "You are being a *ist and I want your post to disappear." This last use seems to overlap with the button for reporting spam / abuse. I assume, though, that most of us wouldn't down-vote a post we disagreed with or didn't find amusing, etc., if we thought of it as voting to hide the post, so the first meaning seems to be eliminated if we use down-votes to hide posts.
4/24/2013 9:09am, #396
4/24/2013 9:34am, #397
This thread is gayer than Fallon Fox sucking cock pre op.GET A RED BELT OR DIE TRYIN'.
4/24/2013 10:17am, #398
4/24/2013 10:23am, #399
liedmentioned about it.
I was the ************ who banned him in the first place. I then went on to state so in the moderators section in the VERY THREAD where Phrost had previously requested us not to issue temp bans. This then generated further discussion on the reason for the ban IE suggestion that a forum member was a pedophile.
Chris then posted a rant on his facebook profile tagging a number of Bullshido admins to bring it to their attention. Phrost's response confirmed my original reason for the ban.
My ensuing comments in this thread to Chris were made intentionally to generate a response, that response being: My post being reported for racial baiting (more off the scale irony from Chris) and further illustration in the thread itself that it's one rule for everyone, if you can't fucking take that ****, don't fucking dish it out.
Here's Chris's rant
Dr. Sleepless has reported a post.
Reason:What the ****? You guys want to show some consistency here? It's totally fine to forever ban from calling someone a THE N-WORD, yet it's totally fine to have a person of the administrative staff to call an Asian person slanty eyed in public? Are you guys fucking retarded?
Sirc then went on to say...
Who was it from and to, and how did you apparently come by that message?"To sin by silence when one should protest makes cowards out of men".
4/24/2013 10:39am, #400
Can I get access to the moderator's section? It seems like that is where the real drama goes on. And people eluding to it makes me feel like I'm in the Bullshido matrix.
Morpheus: You take the Member pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the Moderator pill - you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.