-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17
- Points
- 63
Posted On:
2/28/2013 2:40pm
--
Now, do people consider that a good or bad thing? From my knowledge it's best to roll with anyone and everyone you can. Privates are good sometimes to focus in on and get help with certain things. Also, seems you are much more likely to get hurt rolling with regular students than the instructor.
Here it says:
http://www.yeodojo.net/Instructors.htm
Seems weird he went on a tour with Royce Gracie after just meeting him and beginning BJJ. -

- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Location
- Brazil
- Posts
- 266
Posted On:
2/28/2013 3:36pm
Style: JiuJistu--
The good thing is, and I can tell that from experience (people don't like to train in the mornings so I had 50% privates without paying for any for about a year every day), you train on what you feel you need and what an expert feels you need.
And since the focus is on you, you tend to get more out of it. My Prof. would just drill the same position over and over and teach me combining/complementing escapes for side control until I could "with him letting me to a certain degree" escape his side control. Why? Because he noticed I am lazy when on my back - I still am, but I am a comfortable lazy thanks to him.
So I think you can get a lot out of 1on1 direct instruction, helping with your learning curve and being tailored to your needs.
On the other hand, you don't get that much exposure and you don't get that "angry in your face, I will hand on to this for dear live" type of roll out of your Instructor... And those shape you, especially for competition and stuff.
Id say you should have experienced both. -
pro nonsense self defense
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 11,225
- Points
- 13,772

Posted On:
2/28/2013 3:51pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17
- Points
- 63
Posted On:
2/28/2013 4:03pm -
You have to work the look.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Bat Country
- Posts
- 2,801
- Points
- 4,616

Posted On:
2/28/2013 4:19pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17
- Points
- 63
Posted On:
2/28/2013 4:38pm
--
From my understanding there are problems with Bujinkan's history, they aren't koryu. People like Meik Skoss and Karl Friday can't verify the lineage.
Here's a link to what I'm talking about:
http://www.mardb.com/ninjutsu-and-koryu-bujutsu/Last edited by Silo42; 2/28/2013 4:42pm at .
-
You have to work the look.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Bat Country
- Posts
- 2,801
- Points
- 4,616

Posted On:
2/28/2013 4:44pm -
pro nonsense self defense
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 11,225
- Points
- 13,772

Posted On:
2/28/2013 5:22pm
Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs1
I wasn't specifically talking about the Bujinkan guy- the trend I mention includes teachers from all kinds of styles that don't want to be a public white belt. But the Bujinkan doesn't give out black belts after a few weeks (or less). They don't. They teach a bunch of crap but still make you practice it for a few years to get a black belt. The people I'm talking about aren't people who studied for a few weeks, though. They're people who have invested so much time in an art that its too late to abandon it.
-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 17
- Points
- 63
Posted On:
2/28/2013 5:30pm



Reply With Quote











You have to work the look.
Posted On:
2/28/2013 12:30pm
Style: Judo