Page 6 of 9 First ... 23456789 Last
  1. #51
    NOTE TO SELF - MOAR GRAPPLE - GET A NORMAL HAIR CUT - REPEAT supporting member
    Matt Phillips's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Bahstun
    Posts
    9,753
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Muaythai is younger than BJJ; Judo is the last TMA and the first non-TMA simultaneously.
    Now darkness comes; you don't know if the whales are coming. - Royce Gracie


    KosherKickboxer has t3h r34l chi sao

    In De Janerio, in blackest night,
    Luta Livre flees the fight,
    Behold Maeda's sacred tights;
    Beware my power... Blue Lantern's light!

  2. #52

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    117
    3
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    Re: What exactly qualifies as a Traditional Martial Art?

    If at least grandmaster Helio Gracie had grown a white beard, bjj could be considered a TMA.

  3. #53
    RWaggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,014
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Omega Supreme View Post
    Kyokushin kai is not TMA
    Tell that to the 60 or so Katas I'll need to know before my Shodan test, lol.

    But seriously, I don't really consider it to be TMA either.
    Quote Originally Posted by Devil View Post
    That's the most Krav thing I've ever read. That's Kravver than a ************...

  4. #54
    RWaggs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Kenmore, WA
    Posts
    1,014
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    It's weird...I left a comment earlier in response to Omega, and the YMAS main page says that I left the last comment on this thread, but it's not here.

    *Edit...it appears this one is showing up. I don't get it.

  5. #55
    Permalost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    13,092
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by CrackFox View Post
    You seem to be talking about koryu styles, which is something different again. I was trying to give a working definition of that people mean when they say TMA - something that includes genuinely old styles, and the hundreds of kung-fu/karate/jujutsu/whatever styles that were developed last Tuesday, and which claim to be traditional and deadly.
    Can't we just call the genuinely old styles Old Martial Arts?

  6. #56
    crappler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,747
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Here is my thoughts:

    If it contains anything that is leftover from a bygone era and is totally worthless and stupid and done just because it has always been done, like forcing Jewish kids to eat Gefilte fish or Norwegian kids Lutefisk, it's traditional.

    If it has nothing that is worthless, it's non-traditional.
    "We often joke -- and we really wish it were a joke -- that you will only encounter two basic problems with your 'self-defense' training.
    1) That it doesn't work
    2) That it does work"
    -Animal MacYoung

  7. #57
    crappler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    1,747
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    The defining line is one is interested in doing only what works and testing it, and the other is interested in doing what has always been done and repeating it.
    "We often joke -- and we really wish it were a joke -- that you will only encounter two basic problems with your 'self-defense' training.
    1) That it doesn't work
    2) That it does work"
    -Animal MacYoung

  8. #58

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,271
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Tried posting this before, don't see it, maybe it got abducted, or maybe it's posted but I don't see it, in which case apologies for the double post:

    Okay, so at work, some idiot in front of a buddy of his tries bottling the side of my head. I slip inside (not duck, parry or block--slip) get him in an standing arm triangle. I then quickly change to an ogoshi since my position allows me to use the momentum of the hip-throw to get him and the other idiot through the nearest exit by feeding them both into the doors' crashbars (fire-exits are common in such venues). Close the doors, write the incident report after closing time, go home to a quiet breakfast.

    The little basic bread-and-butter combination I used may have been invented yesterday, or it may be millenia old, with weird stories and movies involving it.

    It may be practised in a gi, street clothes or shorts 'n' rashguard.

    Might have fancy linguistic terminology attached to it. Or not.

    It may or may not be part of some kata or similar sequence somewhere.

    It may or many not have ever been used with success in a ring, mat or octagon.

    There may or may not be some army or LEO service that trains it.

    Could be Western. Could be Eastern. Both. Neither.

    It saved me from eating some glass at work, and got me paid for my work and back home to my wife.

    Am I going to care whether or not it's 'traditional', or part of anything 'traditional'?

    I'm just asking, 'cause the topic keeps resurfacing on this forum. To what useful end does this recurrence happen?

  9. #59
    jnp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    8,344
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence View Post
    Really it seems that the term has little use in actual categorizing or grouping a bunch of arts together by any useful set of criteria. It could be considered taxonomically redundant as a term and perhaps a new term or new terms will spring up to replace it in time.

    Perhaps one of the reasons that the 'Traditional' label has managed to survive, its memetic quality so to speak, is that it in conjures up an image of martial arts style that are of a similar mindset in the mind of the person using the term.

    For example when people say traditional do they really mean that in their experience practitioners of the arts make appeals to authority style arguments when trying to justify the validity of their style, using the age of a technique or style (quite often falsely) or the fact that it has been done like that for generations, quoting masters and grand-masters, and placing time served as more important that technical ability, or making assumptions that time served equals technical ability. Instead of making they arguments based on sparring and competition.

    It's about the only reason i can think of for the term still being in use, that it goes someway towards describing the typical practitioner, rather than actual describe the arts practiced.
    Good lord, you're even more verbose than I am. That said, I agree. The term "traditional" is an outdated and imperfect description.


    Quote Originally Posted by Vieux Normand View Post
    I'm just asking, 'cause the topic keeps resurfacing on this forum. To what useful end does this recurrence happen?
    Because members here like discussing both semantics and nomenclature. It's tied to the "need to classify everything" gene that seems prevalent in many geeks martial artists.
    Shut the hell up and train.

  10. #60

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    115
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by alex View Post
    yes.

    traditional is a misnomer. could use something like static i guess? muay thai over the course of its history has changed quite a bit. forms in arts dont change though do they?
    Judo has changed significantly, the question is, is it a Martial art? I would guess that every art changes and evolves.

Page 6 of 9 First ... 23456789 Last

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO