Sifu Rice At A Glance

[Mister]

So, how many posts and threads do you need?

I know he ain't new we chatted a while ago, I was trying to lift his spirits a bit.

Seems it wasn't needed though.

[It is Fake]

I know he ain't new we chatted a little before, I was trying to lift his spirits a bit.

Hmmm, I see you didn't answer my question. He is in a ditch, he dug himself and the dirt keeps pouring back in. Instead of getting out and starting over, he keeps on shoveling.

[Mister]

Hmmm, I see you didn't answer my question. He is in a ditch, he dug himself and the dirt keeps pouring back in. Instead of getting out and starting over, he keeps on shoveling.

So, how many posts and threads do you need

Oh I thought it was a rhetorical question.

I need 2 please.

[It is Fake]

Oh I thought it was a rhetorical question.

I need 2 please.

You were talking to him like you didn't know people have SERIOUSLY tried to help him. Every time, no that isn't an exaggeration, it ends up with him blaming everyone for his mistakes.

[Mister]

You were talking to him like you didn't know people have SERIOUSLY tried to help him. Every time, no that isn't an exaggeration, it ends up with him blaming everyone for his mistakes.

I was talking to him like that because I didn't know people have tried to help him.

[itwasntme]

DO, I really need to explain this to you? No, you don't get it because this is your third culpability spin attempt.

Presenting information /= culpability spin. You are doing to me exactly what you are accusing me of doing to Larry.

[submessenger]

Presenting information /= culpability spin. You are doing to me exactly what you are accusing me of doing to Larry.

Larry isn't trying to investigate you.

[itwasntme]

Larry isn't trying to investigate you.

I am simply stating I have placed no guilt on anyone so how could I move it around? It doesn't exist.

I put a lot of time into researching this and then writing a document that was as non-accusatory as possible. I omitted information that could have put a negative light on Larry yet wasn't solid evidence, imo. This isn't just about Larry. And yes, I feel because it's me and I didn't state every detail of my plans so as not to derail this section that I have been misrepresented.

I can see that there was more work that needed to be done before posting anything. That doesn't mean I have a torch and a pitchfork, I was merely asking for information and displaying what I have found.

[submessenger]

I am simply stating I have placed no guilt on anyone so how could I move it around? It doesn't exist.

I put a lot of time into researching this and then writing a document that was as non-accusatory as possible. I omitted information that could have put a negative light on Larry yet wasn't solid evidence, imo. This isn't just about Larry. And yes, I feel because it's me and I didn't state every detail of my plans so as not to derail this section that I have been misrepresented.

I can see that there was more work that needed to be done before posting anything. That doesn't mean I have a torch and a pitchfork, I was merely asking for information and displaying what I have found.

So, in other words, you researched and found nothing that was worthy of investigation, but plowed ahead with a MABS thread, anyways? That smacks of vendetta, not honest inquiry.

[itwasntme]

So, in other words, you researched and found nothing that was worthy of investigation, but plowed ahead with a MABS thread, anyways? That smacks of vendetta, not honest inquiry.

Obviously myself and at least a few others were "uneasy" at what I had found and felt it should be looked at. It's not like anyone came on here starting a smear campaign.

Also, I apparently did not fully understand the MABS guidelines. I wanted to work on something for the wiki and thought that would be the correct starting forum.

Edit: To avoid running in more circles, I'm just going to agree to disagree. In the mean time I will still have this as a side project.