Sifu Rice At A Glance

[DerAuslander]

My argument doesn't depend on no one using Ju Jitsu as a spelling for BJJ. I still would suggest that anyone honestly asking herself, absent any other indication, if a website listing MAs taught at a school says simply "Ju Jitsu," is it more likely that it refers to BJJ or JJJ, there is an obvious answer.

Wow.

You really need to bone up on your Romanji history.

However, this point isn't essential. Contrary to Der Auslander's distortion, my argument never rested "just" on the spelling point. That was an intentional misunderstanding on his part.

Uh, no, dipshit.

Just because I call someone a fucktard, doesn't mean I am calling you a fucktard, unless you actually happen to be a fucktard. Are you a fucktard, fucktard?

Even if we ignore the absence of "Brazilian" and imagine that it is just as common in this country to mean BJJ by "Ju Jitsu" .

Are you fucking kidding me?

You could not be more wrong about that.

[ChuckWepner]

[QUOTE=DerAuslander;2747661]Wow.

You really need to bone up on your Romanji history.
[/OPEN]

This isn't about the history of Romanji, it is about what the normal usage and understanding of "Ju Jitsu" in one particular kind of context is. You are blowing smoke.

Uh, no, dipshit.

Just because I call someone a fucktard, doesn't mean I am calling you a fucktard, unless you actually happen to be a fucktard. Are you a fucktard, fucktard?

Right, Shakespeare, you weren't distorting *my* argument, you were creating an imaginary possible opponent to gratuitously insult for offering a dumbed down version of my argument. No one is going to believe your obvious lie here. Sad.

[ChuckWepner]

Originally Posted by ChuckWepner
Even if we ignore the absence of "Brazilian" and imagine that it is just as common in this country to mean BJJ by "Ju Jitsu" .

Originally posted by Der Auslander
Are you fucking kidding me?

You could not be more wrong about that.

Nice job chopping sentence fragments to distort meaning by eliminating context. Your intellectual honesty matches the chastity of the average crack whore. And it is about as hard to discern.

You obviously have serious problems about representing others' views honestly, even when the dishonesty is readily discoverable. The fact that you can do no better than drool out "fucktard" over and over is pathetic, but only makes you contemptible.

Your unwillingness to be even minimally intellectually honest puts you beneath contempt.

[DerAuslander]

No, it means that you have tried to make a bigger deal over my original statements in this thread than what I had said, decided to be a douchebag, and are generally now just being an idiot, and making massive fucking assumptions about what X means in a given country.

Go back and read what I wrote, and then do everyone on this forum a favor and shut the **** up.

[JingMerchant!]

My argument doesn't depend on no one using Ju Jitsu as a spelling for BJJ. I still would suggest that anyone honestly asking herself, absent any other indication, if a website listing MAs taught at a school says simply "Ju Jitsu," is it more likely that it refers to BJJ or JJJ, there is an obvious answer.

No, there's an obvious inference. An inference which would not necessarily be the correct one. We would require further evidence, before drawing any conclusion as to the style.

One of us is weighing evidence; the other is plugging his ears and stamping his feet. And pretty much anyone reading the thread can tell which is which.

All I see, is a wild overreaction, to something DerAus wrote.

However, this point isn't essential. Contrary to Der Auslander's distortion, my argument never rested "just" on the spelling point. That was an intentional misunderstanding on his part.

Where did DerAus state that your point rested solely on the spelling...?

Seriously dude, you need to sit back, count to ten and breathe.
He critiqued your point, in a manner that is par-for-the-course on this site and you respond with this :-

Nice job chopping sentence fragments to distort meaning by eliminating context. Your intellectual honesty matches the chastity of the average crack whore. And it is about as hard to discern.

You obviously have serious problems about representing others' views honestly, even when the dishonesty is readily discoverable. The fact that you can do no better than drool out "fucktard" over and over is pathetic, but only makes you contemptible.

Your unwillingness to be even minimally intellectually honest puts you beneath contempt.

Mate, where did all this vitriol come from...?

Settle down Beavis.

[itwasntme]

Uh-oh. Someone's about to get out Ockham's razor and then we're all gonna learn what real no holds barred looks like!

Occam's razor is for lazy people, so I doubt there will be anything considered no holds barred to follow.

[It is Fake]

Occam's razor is for lazy people,

Then you should have used it before starting this thread.

[Mister]

No, I think it's fucking stupid of anyone of any bandwagon to assume he teaches Japanese, Brazilian, or Narnian style just because he spells it jujutsu, jujitsu, jiu-jitsu, or whatever.

Well, it's good that I didn't do that, then, and that I'm not on any bandwagon.

It got personal right here when he started defending himself.

Maybe he just didn't like the usage of the phrase fucking stupid.

I think this is a misunderstanding, he assumed just because something is fucking stupid then he had to be fucking stupid for thinking it.

Fucking stupid thoughts can come from perfectly reasonable guys.

I think we should all get along.

Now that's fucking stupid.

[itwasntme]

Then you should have used it before starting this thread.

And miss out on all the opinionated jerks squabble? I'd sooner die.

And yes, I am calling myself an opinionated jerk also.

[It is Fake]

And miss out on all the opinionated jerks squabble? I'd sooner die.

Wow, your reading is terrible.

And yes, I am calling myself an opinionated jerk also.

Yes and I called you lazy. No, you didn't understand my comment.