-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Monterey, Ca
- Posts
- 16
- Points
- 156
Posted On:
12/02/2012 11:47am -
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Colne
- Posts
- 7
- Points
- 96
Posted On:
12/02/2012 1:04pm
Style: Goshin Kempo Ju Jitsu--
It should not just be the Martial art that your learning but the language and the history behind it otherwise it will be lost, if you ask a student where there martial art comes from they should be able to tell you.
If you introduce history and the language to your syllabus it makes it more than just a fighting or self defence system. -
You have to work the look.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Bat Country
- Posts
- 2,789
- Points
- 4,591

Posted On:
12/02/2012 1:10pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2011
- Location
- Fargo, North Dakota
- Posts
- 150
- Points
- 327
Posted On:
12/02/2012 1:24pm -
His heart was visible, and the dismal sack that maketh excrement of what is eaten.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 5,154
- Points
- 10,311



Posted On:
12/02/2012 1:42pm4
The bottom line is that there is no link between language and martial effectiveness. There is also no link between language and honor and there is no link between language and discipline. And if history is your concern, it can be taught in any language.
If you enjoy teaching and/or learning using Japanese, there's nothing wrong with that. You're right, it does make your martial art more than a fighting system. It makes it a fighting system with additional vocabulary. But the use of Japanese or any other language adds nothing that's essential for a student to learn technique, discipline, character or history. Japanese is not a magic wand for martial arts excellence. -
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Colne
- Posts
- 7
- Points
- 96
Posted On:
12/02/2012 1:58pm
Style: Goshin Kempo Ju Jitsu--
I just think as I do traditional Ju-jitsu it's only respectful to learn the history and language as part of my syllabus.
I know that my style came from Liverpool but the martial art still came from Japan and we still use such weapons as the Katana and the Naganata which were used by the Samurai warriors and we still have to do traditional sword presentation.
I respect every Martial art and I really think trying more makes you a better Martial artist. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Ottawa (Canada)
- Posts
- 211
- Points
- 409


Posted On:
12/02/2012 2:51pm
Style: Pradal Serey & BJJ--
I like learning the "official" Japanese names of moves for the cultural / traditional aspect it brings to training. I understand that not everyone's into that so another reason I like learning the "official" names of moves is that it makes it easier to consistently transfer knowledge from one school or style to the next. For example, I've dropped into MMA / grappling / jiu-jitsu classes where someone has said Apply the scarf hold. ??? Y'know, that headlock pin. ??? Y'know, the number one hold down. ??? Y'know, kesa gatame. Oooooooooooooh! Right! No problem! Makes things easier this way.
-
3
I like the idea that using Japanese nomenclature to aid understanding between people from different backgrounds
In practice it does not always work that way
We had a French judoka train with us (an English speaking dojo)
His pronunciation of the nominally Japanese words was quite different on many occasions and required a demonstration of the technique in question
I also think expecting young children to learn Japanese nomenclature is unhelpfull and distracting



Reply With Quote













Posted On:
12/02/2012 10:41am
Style: Goshin Kempo Ju Jitsu
Should we still teach Japanese in the dojo?