1. #1
    bobyclumsyninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bahstun
    Posts
    7,058
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    Fed appeals court strikes down DOMA

    http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...dge/?mobile=nc

    [W]e conclude that review of Section 3 of DOMA requires heightened scrutiny. The Supreme Court uses certain factors to decide whether a new classification qualifies as a quasi-suspect class. They include: A) whether the class has been historically “subjected to discrimination,”; B) whether the class has a defining characteristic that “frequently bears [a] relation to ability to perform or contribute to society,” C) whether the class exhibits “obvious, immutable, or distinguishing characteristics that define them as a discrete group;” and D) whether the class is “a minority or politically powerless.” Immutability and lack of political power are not strictly necessary factors to identify a suspect class. Nevertheless, immutability and political power are indicative, and we consider them here. In this case, all four factors justify heightened scrutiny: A) homosexuals as a group have historically endured persecution and discrimination; B) homosexuality has no relation to aptitude or ability to contribute to society; C) homosexuals are a discernible group with non-obvious distinguishing characteristics, especially in the subset of those who enter same-sex marriages; and D) the class remains a politically weakened minority.

  2. #2
    goodlun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ramona CA
    Posts
    7,314
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    "classification of same-sex spouses was not substantially related to an important government interest"
    I think this has to be one of the absolute best quotes regarding this matter.

  3. #3
    It is Fake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    34,442
    1
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Funny, you have a tag that says "STAFF WRITER" and you don't write ****. That's noob ****. You know better.

  4. #4
    bobyclumsyninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bahstun
    Posts
    7,058
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by It is Fake View Post
    Funny, you have a tag that says "STAFF WRITER" and you don't write ****. That's noob ****. You know better.
    Right you are.

    I'm writing on it, but didn't finish, and wanted to get the thread going.

  5. #5
    It is Fake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    34,442
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Gotcha...

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    144
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    So tired of all the "YAY ! Screw those republicans!" nonsense over this on my social media. Clinton signed this piece of **** into law, and the Obama whitehouse was defending it a coupla years back.

  7. #7
    bobyclumsyninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Bahstun
    Posts
    7,058
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by justsome View Post
    So tired of all the "YAY ! Screw those republicans!" nonsense over this on my social media. Clinton signed this piece of **** into law, and the Obama whitehouse was defending it a coupla years back.
    Clinton's lowest moment IMO. It was wrong then, and it's wrong now, and it's going down (pun intended).

    People are criticizing Republicans on this, because they still largely support it, and would love a constitutional amendment enshrining it. That's worthy of criticism.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    144
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    That is indeed the case; i just wish these spoon-fed idiots had some grasp of history before they just parroted the company line.

    ' Clinton's lowest moment IMO." Heh. That's sayin' somethin', given the jizz-stained dress an whatnot.

  9. #9
    goodlun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ramona CA
    Posts
    7,314
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    [QUOTE=justsome;2732085
    ' Clinton's lowest moment IMO." Heh. That's sayin' somethin', given the jizz-stained dress an whatnot.[/QUOTE]
    Meh Jizz-Stained dress and the whatnot isn't a public policy.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO