Emf = prepare for bull

**goodlun** · Posted On: 10/14/2012 4:43pm

Originally Posted by thrutch

I think this thread has given me dick cancer. :(

Are you sure BrunotheBig's mom didn't give it to you?

**slamdunc** · Posted On: 10/14/2012 6:53pm

Originally Posted by goodlun

Are you sure BrunotheBig's mom didn't give it to you?

It may be because he carries his cell phone in his pocket LOL.

**Bneterasedmynam** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 1:29pm

Originally Posted by goodlun

Attachment 13829
Just to make things more clear.
All the above stuff produces an EM Field
The stuff to the right aka Ionizing radiation does kick out Alpha and Beta Particles
The stuff to the left is does not contain enough energy to ionize atoms or molecules; thus, it cannot break chemical bonds or (according to current conventional studies) directly cause DNA damage thus cannot cause cancer.
Basically saying what you said but without all the bullshit and being well accurate and right.

Can you post a reference for this chart?? Most of the studies I have seen are either biased or just don't produce enough evidence to make a conclusion one way or the other on the association with magnetic fields and cancer.

**Magpie McGee** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 1:49pm

How the flying **** can someone have a bias regarding that? Are all radiations studies done by the Illuminati trying to give us all cancer so they can depopulate the planet and make room for the Mole-people to invade?

I'm with goodlun
**** OFF

**Mr. Machette** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 2:14pm

Originally Posted by Magpie McGee

How the flying **** can someone have a bias regarding that?

Easy. If the study is done by the entitiy that creats the radioavtice product then they are biased towards declaring that product safe.

That said, the science behind which frequecies of EMF are capable of ionizing molecules is pretty hard to dispute. If the machine doesn't emit radiation capable of messing with molecular structures then it can't mess with DNA. Science fact.

**Magpie McGee** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 2:39pm

Originally Posted by Mr. Machette

Easy. If the study is done by the entitiy that creats the radioavtice product then they are biased towards declaring that product safe.

So my cell phone has become sentient and is conducting independent research. Oh shi-

**Mr. Machette** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 2:43pm

Originally Posted by Magpie McGee

So the my cell phone has become sentient and is conducting independent research. Oh shi-

Lets just thank our lucky stars they were never made with thumbs!

**Bneterasedmynam** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 3:15pm

Originally Posted by Magpie McGee

How the flying **** can someone have a bias regarding that? Are all radiations studies done by the Illuminati trying to give us all cancer so they can depopulate the planet and make room for the Mole-people to invade?

I'm with goodlun
**** OFF

Are you fucking retarded?? Anyone with money invested in any product that produces a magnetic field would have a stake in those findings, and therefor would benefit from a skewed report.

And where the fucking hell did I say anything about being on anyone's side?? I asked for references to the chart so I can make my own decision based on the facts presented. Just go and do a google search on this subject and you will find 5000 opinions and biased reports. All I'm trying to do is sort the bs from lesser bs so I can make an informed decision on weather the power lines where I live are going to make me glow in the dark, or if my cellphone is going to rot off my dick.

**goodlun** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 3:41pm

Originally Posted by Bneterasedmynam

Can you post a reference for this chart?? Most of the studies I have seen are either biased or just don't produce enough evidence to make a conclusion one way or the other on the association with magnetic fields and cancer.

Well if you look at the bottom right hand of the chart you will see the copy right information
http://emfscan.com/
I would say most of the information that is on http://emfscan.com/ from a cursory look matches up with my Academic Knowledge (BSEE) of Electromagnetic Fields.
You see the cell phone is nothing more than a fancy radio so what it produces are radio waves.
If radio waves give you cancer we are all really really fucked. As we are bombarded with them day in and day out all day long. Hell that wireless router you have in your house same type of radio waves.
Hell not even having a cell phone your still exposed to the radio signals from the cell phone towers.
The thing is you have to be able to do damage to the DNA to cause cancer.
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/canc...causes-cancer2
This explains how radiation causes mutations to DNA
http://www.windows2universe.org/eart...on_damage.html
So to cause cancer you have to have an ionizing source of radiation.
Radio waves are not ionizing radiation.

**goodlun** · Posted On: 10/17/2012 3:44pm

Here is a chart from the EPA
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/underst...nonionize.html
Its the same chart you will see how it matches up to virtually all other EM field charts for what is and is not ionizing radiation.