wahts? Me enhglish be pereftc!!!
Originally Posted by battlefields
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
I don't like the explanation that there are fewer deaths therefore bareknuckle is safer; there are so many reasons this can be true; I'm guessing this has something to do with it:
Originally Posted by article
I think this guy is a little high on his own ideas. In the "championship" fight he posted his opponent looks terrible. I also can't fathom why they both head hunted in a bare knuckle fight.
Barenkuclee is +#3 8RU+413$+xorxorz!!!!!
I'll bet a good Greco Roman wrestler could beat Gunn for the bareknuckle title, via repeated throws on an unforgiving surface.
On what basis do you think this? A concussion is a deep-tissue injury. Deep-tissue injuries are easier to inflict when your own surface areas are protected (as in American football). Why would boxing-versus-bareknuckle show any difference in this regard?
Originally Posted by Bneterasedmynam
Didn't Baren Kucklee invent the sandwich or something?
Plus drastically increased nutrition and conditioning. When barenkuclee boxing was in vogue, a four minute mile was believed mathematically and physically impossible.
Originally Posted by Permalost
"Your body must be like a stone, your mind... like a meatloaf."
Originally Posted by strikistanian
Originally Posted by Devil
Yes, but it was taken of the menu by the Marquess of Queensberry.
Originally Posted by Rivington
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO