-
Knock-off Cthulhu
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Helsinki / Finland
- Posts
- 2,146
- Points
- 3,589


Posted On:
7/30/2012 2:53am
Style: None until 04/13.1
I never thought about penalizing the opponent, as you said the techniques that caused the injuries were completely valid.
IIRC in IBJJF rulesets the referee can stop the fight when injuries happen, enforcing contestant safety even when they are willing to risk serious injury. I was kinda surprised that there's no such thing in Olympic Judo.
However I completely understand why the Romanian wanted to continue, it was the goddamn Olympics final after all.Curiosity killed the cat. But damn it had a blast. -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 442
- Points
- 672

Posted On:
7/31/2012 4:04am -
Gnarly King of Half-Guard
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 4,135
- Points
- 6,408

Posted On:
7/31/2012 4:24am--
Hilariously, because the IJF imagines it makes Judo better to watch.
More seriously, to differentiate Judo from wrestling and because shooting bad leg attacks was functional as a stalling tactic or to get out of unfavourable gripping situations given the lack of penalty for being on your belly. Doing bad forward throw attempts is still fine.
Does any other Olympic sport feel the need to DQ so many of its competitors? -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 4,653
- Points
- 5,323




Posted On:
7/31/2012 6:23am -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 4,653
- Points
- 5,323




Posted On:
7/31/2012 3:38pm -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Posts
- 3,549
- Points
- 8,837

Posted On:
8/01/2012 4:01pm



Reply With Quote














Posted On:
7/29/2012 8:31pm