Results 21 to 23 of 23
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- wernersville, PA
- Posts
- 106
- Points
- 173

Posted On:
6/30/2012 5:36am
Style: no gi grappling/sambo--
Thanks. That is kind of what I had in mind. I have seen grappling schools where guys were working mount escapes and whatnot and can't yet properly bridge or shrimp. Seems counterproductive. I had similar issues at the first bjj school I went to. I left there because it all seemed like a big mess and turned me off of grappling for awhile. I felt like the newbs at the school were just grappling dummies for the more experienced guys to exploit. If they had a proper curriculum I would have stayed.
-
12th level logic wielder
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Vancouver, BC
- Posts
- 1,956
- Points
- 3,572


Posted On:
6/30/2012 9:55am
Style: BJJ, judo, rapier--
To some extent, I think this will always happen. A good curriculum where things are broken down into levels and every officially-Intermediate student has had opportunity to work all the basics should minimise it, but let’s face it: Everyone has to start somewhere, everyone is going to suck at bridging/bumping an opponent off the first few times they do it.
It sounds to me like your first club had a cultural problem first and foremost. I suppose I could treat the absolute beginners as mere grappling dummies, but what would the point of that be? I’ve risen somewhat above my original suckage thanks to people, instructors and more senior students, who encouraged and helped me, pointed out my mistakes that they exploited, taught me the proper escapes. (During and in between the beatings, of course.) I wouldn’t want to do any less for the people coming in the door now. We’re supposed to be a club and a team, right?[ petterhaggholm.net | blog | essays ]
[ self defence: general thoughts | bjj: “don’t go to the ground”? ]
“The plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.”



Reply With Quote











R.I.P.
Posted On:
6/29/2012 11:41am
Style: xingyi