-
Martial mediocrite
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 3,157
Posted On:
4/18/2004 8:36pm
Style: Using bag as aggro outlet--
No, Western MA are a lot older than Hellenic civilisation. And Pankration just plain doesn't exist any more, as far as I know.
What am I?:
I am ignorant, thieving, lying, hypocrital, violent and thoroughly self obssessed. I steal from others to make myself look better, only to make the item or information worse.
I go on and on and ON about how brave and strong and brilliant and wealthy I am, but in the end I'm all mouth and no trousers.
That's right children, I'm your average AMERICUNT! and I exemplify AMERICA!:911flag:
:occasion1
JohnnyCache's "retort" proving how much he knows about medicine and geography and First World countries:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...=78188&page=22
Yes, through persistent lack of work and the cultivation of ignorance, he is a true American.
-
Bonta-kun
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Singapore
- Posts
- 2,273
- Points
- 2,698

Posted On:
4/19/2004 12:03am
Style: fumoffu!--
As i had said,the modern Pankration is just a revival art like Greco-Roman wrestling, got no direct origin from ancient Greeks or Romans~~~
And i agree that Western MA are a lot older than Hellenic civilisation, this summary of mine is intended to explain to those TCMA people in another board that boxing could be considered martial art,so i skip the part prior to the Greek civilization~~~"People think that judo is only unarmed combat - but you are never unarmed when you can hit someone with a planet. "
- Uncyclopedia entry on Judo -
Merry Christmas Bitch
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 20,895
Posted On:
5/06/2004 11:29am--
While it is still hotly contested, there is some evidence to suggest that the first MA were african in origin and perhaps the first "written" proof of "martial" training were Egyptian.
While the "true" MA of pankration may very well not exsist anymore, there are a few that practise "modern Pankration".
Wrestling would have been the first MA to be taught due to the relative safety in the way it can be taught and still be effective.
But with out a doubt, "rock-in-hand" was the first ever Martial art ;) -
Bonta-kun
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Singapore
- Posts
- 2,273
- Points
- 2,698

Posted On:
5/06/2004 11:33am -
Merry Christmas Bitch
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 20,895
Posted On:
5/06/2004 11:48am -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Location
- Virginia
- Posts
- 228
Posted On:
5/06/2004 11:59am
Style: BJJ, CSW--
I think the biggest differences between Far Eastern and Western methods of martial training are cultural. Throughout the entire Far East, tradition and order are highly valued. This is why to this day you still find many schools training in what is essentially medieval oritental weaponry and going about doing structuralized katas (with the exception of many Southeast asian styles of fighting). The asian mindset felt a need to put an order to something as chaotic as combat, as well as to retain the traditions of their forefathers. This is the sort of thing you'll find in traditional styles like Karate, TKD, TJJ, Kung Fu, etc.
The Western philosophy toward combat is much more utilitarian. To hell with tradition, if it isn't useful anymore, let's get the new thing that is. Innovation and technology is the key. The european arts of swordplay, save for fencing, has nearly died out thanks to the innovations of the firearm. The skill of a soldier with a horse is now non-existent thanks to things like tanks and helicopters. Learn what works and get good at doing it. This is why things regarded as western combat sports like boxing and wrestling have no such thing as stylized kata.
Furthermore, in times of war asian countries typically warred amongst themselves. They almost always used similar tactics and technology. Technology and innovation was simply less of a factor to them.
The west, however, not only fought amongst themselves but were often at war with outside cultures, and often adopted or modified tactics to approach new problems. The Greeks fought the Persians, the Romans fought everyone, Europeans fought Saracens. The Crusaders learned the value of a two wall defense for fortifications in the Crusades and brought that back to Europe. The Europeans also saw the value that technology could play on the battlefield, and that often the winner was the one with the latest and greatest weaponry.
It's a little rambling, but as I said, I think the difference between Oriental and Western ways of fighting comes from the respective cultures. I'm not neccessarily saying one is right or wrong, just different. -
Merry Christmas Bitch
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 20,895
Posted On:
5/06/2004 12:20pm--
Indeed, eastern cultures mystify martial arts and some of the practitioners, while the west tends to be more grounded.
While empty handed combat always holds a "special place" in any Eastern MA, its less so in the western ones.
In many ways, practicality was of the upmost importnace in western MA, while in eastern MA, even though it was VITAL, many "wasted" precious energy on esoteric crap to add "prestige" to their chosen MA. -
Bonta-kun
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Singapore
- Posts
- 2,273
- Points
- 2,698

Posted On:
5/06/2004 10:44pm -
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- CA
- Posts
- 228
Posted On:
5/06/2004 10:54pm
Style: Sanshou/Wrestling--
That is quite true.
When you do challenge a TMAist to fight, the usual excuse is: Our master didn't teach us to fight because he was afraid that we would use the skills to hurt...My master has defeated 4 world champions on this principle.
Then we go at it, and they don't really stand a chance...



Reply With Quote











Bonta-kun
Posted On:
4/18/2004 8:34pm
Style: fumoffu!
A brief view of Western Martial Art