224760 Bullies, 3606 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 1 to 10 of 61
Page 1 of 7 1 2345 ... LastLast
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. YeongJin is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    15

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 12:01pm


     Style: Hapkido

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!

    People still argue sport vs. street? 3 years later yep.

    I have read a great many of the posts on this thread. Some very intelligent and some seem quite foolish. So, I figured I would add my two cents worth. Some will most likely agree others will say I am full of ****. Either way I don't really care. First I have over 25 years of experience. During that time I have trained in several different martial arts both traditional arts that many people say suck and some of the arts like BJJ and Muay Thai which some of those same people think are the only martial arts that are worth learning. My primary style is Hapkido! I want to bring up a few things:

    1) When peoplse say that the only way to know if your Hapkido works is to enter a grappling tournament or a kickboxing or full contact match they are comaping apples to oranges. THESE ARE SPORT COMPETITIONS! I would agree that Hapkido training would not make you a great grappler or kickboxer. That does not mean it doesn't work! In a real world environment "self defense situation" Hapkido will work. I know this because I have used my Hapkido as a bouncer so don't go attacking me asking how I know. I have also taugh many law eforcement officers and had them come back to me with stories of how they used some of the Hapkido techniques they had learned.

    2) Hapkido is not the answer for everything or everybody. If you are a MMA competitor then you should not spend the majority of your time training in Hapkido. It simply is not designed for that.

    3) If all you do is practice your Hapkido from wrist grabs then your Hapkido needs to be updated. (Not the mainstream traditionalists view I'm sure)

    4) Not all techniques work perfectly all the time. No technique from any art will.

    5) The joint locks of Hapkido will work but have to be put in the correct context. I will explain this in greater detail if anyone asks about it.

    Anyway, enough of this for now. Time to go do some real training! I'm sure I will get the chance to continue this discussion later!
  2. TNMP is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    107

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 12:37pm


     Style: taekkyon, judo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    got out the checklist, no space left to put any new marks
  3. Permalost is offline
    Permalost's Avatar

    pro nonsense self defense

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    12,553

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 12:59pm

    supporting member
     Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by YeongJin View Post
    First I have over 25 years of experience. During that time I have trained in several different martial arts both traditional arts that many people say suck and some of the arts like BJJ and Muay Thai which some of those same people think are the only martial arts that are worth learning.
    You're missing the part where the stereotypical TMA guys go on about how their art is superior than BJJ/muay thai/MMA, on both practical and philosophical grounds. Surely you've seen this if you've trained for 25 years. Its as valid as the complaint that MMA/BJJ people say that other arts don't work.

    1) When peoplse say that the only way to know if your Hapkido works is to enter a grappling tournament or a kickboxing or full contact match they are comaping apples to oranges. THESE ARE SPORT COMPETITIONS! I would agree that Hapkido training would not make you a great grappler or kickboxer. That does not mean it doesn't work! In a real world environment "self defense situation" Hapkido will work. I know this because I have used my Hapkido as a bouncer so don't go attacking me asking how I know. I have also taugh many law eforcement officers and had them come back to me with stories of how they used some of the Hapkido techniques they had learned.
    Counterpoint: if you can't make your hapkido work in a controlled environment, you shouldn't be too confident about it in an uncontrolled one. The context that you described (bouncer and law enforcement) aren't really allowed to do anything that they couldn't do in a MMA fight (security guards can't go around punching throats and poking eyes). If they were to escalate the level of force past what one might do in MMA, they'd go to their weapons, not their hapkido.

    2) Hapkido is not the answer for everything or everybody. If you are a MMA competitor then you should not spend the majority of your time training in Hapkido. It simply is not designed for that.
    Who is hapkido for?

    3) If all you do is practice your Hapkido from wrist grabs then your Hapkido needs to be updated. (Not the mainstream traditionalists view I'm sure)
    Are you saying that mainstream traditionalist hapkido guys only practice hapkido against wrist grabs?

    4) Not all techniques work perfectly all the time. No technique from any art will.
    Yes, but some have a higher percentage of working than others. Many hapkido techniques are low-percentage against real people.

    5) The joint locks of Hapkido will work but have to be put in the correct context. I will explain this in greater detail if anyone asks about it.
    You can if you want to, but I'm pretty sure nobody said that joint locks don't work at all.
  4. YeongJin is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    15

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 2:38pm


     Style: Hapkido

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    I agree that that are a lot of TMA people who will try and tell you why their art is superior to every other art. I am not one of those guys. I get sick of hearing things from the TMA guys like this too.

    As far as your counterpoint concerning bouncers, and law enforcement officers goes: There are plenty of times when the situation would not allow them to use most of the techniques common in MMA. There are also times when they are at a high enough use of force level that would alow them to do pretty much anything including their firearm. Please remember I am not saying that other martial arts styles don't have any value. I am simply saying that if a person studies hapkido diligently then it will work for self defense.

    I should also note that the way I practice and teach hapkido has been modified because of my experience in the other arts I have studied. I found some of the training methods out dated. Learning so many techniques from someone grabbing your wrist. In my experience many Hapkido practitioners do spend a lot of time on wrist grab defenses which I don't really see as being the most efficient way to train. Ofcourse that's not all that the mainstream traditional guys do but they certainly do alot of it.

    I would like to know your justification for saying that many hapkido techiques are low percentage against "real people" which techniques are you refering to? This is a hard assumption to make because hapkido varies greatly from one instructor to the next. It is and always has been kind of an eclectic art. I'm sure there are techniques that are being taught by instructors that would not work that well in the real world and I'm sure they are being taught by people calling themselves "hapkido instructors". This is the problem with hapkido or any other art. I have seen people teaching hapkido that does not resemble the hapkido that I know and teach hardly at all. Yet it is labeled as hapkido. So if someone sees that and it sucks then that is what they now consider to be hapkido.
  5. Petter is offline

    12th level logic wielder

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,964

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 3:37pm


     Style: BJJ, judo, rapier

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by YeongJin View Post
    1) When peoplse say that the only way to know if your Hapkido works is to enter a grappling tournament or a kickboxing or full contact match they are comaping apples to oranges. THESE ARE SPORT COMPETITIONS! I would agree that Hapkido training would not make you a great grappler or kickboxer. That does not mean it doesn't work! In a real world environment "self defense situation" Hapkido will work. I know this because I have used my Hapkido as a bouncer so don't go attacking me asking how I know.
    Supposing for the sake of argument that we accept at face value your claim to having used it in real fights, there are two problems with this. One is that effectiveness (barring preposterous conjuring tricks as seen in pressure-point/no-touch knockouts) is relative, not absolute. The question is not whether Hapkido works at all so much as whether it is good enough to be a valid alternative to, say, judo or BJJ. The fact that you managed to use hapkido techniques to subdue some opponents tell us nothing about how good it is in comparison to anything else. Maybe you'd be twice as good, and get there in half the training time, doing judo. If so, I think we're justified in considering judo training superior.

    The second problem is that these isolated anecdotes of "I subdued that guy" or "this guy I know defended himself", apart from being unverifiable, are anecdotes bereft of context, not data. It could mean that hapkido is fantastic, but we also have to consider possibilities like

    • You were only able to do it because you're naturally tough and strong, or talented at fighting, and are able to fight in spite of inferior training; you might have been able to spin-kick them into oblivion training in nothing but ballet.
    • You only faced easy opponents: drunk, incompetent, lacking in intent (maybe they struggled with the bouncers, but didn't really want to escalate, when what they really wanted was to beat the **** out of some other guy).
    • We have access only to anecdotes with a strong confirmation bias: suppose you have access to ten success stories; how many failures would go along with those if we could somehow generate a statistically significant and representative sample?
    • …And so on.

    When judging the effectiveness of combat sport oriented arts, in contexts such as MMA, these factors are mitigated. Sample sizes are larger, and exceptional individuals will rise to the top regardless of style background. Everyone is in shape and no one is drunk. We can record both wins and losses. Thus, though the odd exception proves very little (e.g. Machida as the only high-profile Shotokan[ish] stylist), general trends are significant (clearly wrestling, BJJ, and Muay Thai are very successful styles). This tells us something meaningful. It's true that MMA is a simulation of free combat, and not equivalent to a life-or-death fight, but it's the best simulation that gives us enough evidence to draw any solid conclusions. Thus we're inclined to think that a style that fails to show its effectiveness in the only arena where we can establish quality is probably lacking therein.

    I also find it curious how often people drag out the bouncer card -- "I'm a bouncer, therefore I am an authority on fighting!" I thought the point of a good bouncer was to avoid physical altercations as far as possible, using people skills; and if physical force became the unfortunate necessity, use it minimally and with the advantage of numbers (and often sheer bulk). (Of course, if someone is intimidated, outnumbered, or just physically inferior, it is probably much easier to control him via pain compliance, wristlocks &c., than it would ever be to use them to win a fight.)
    [ petterhaggholm.net | blog | essays ]
    [ self defence: general thoughts | bjj: “don’t go to the ground”? ]
    “The plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.”
  6. YeongJin is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    15

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 4:05pm


     Style: Hapkido

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Again I am not attacking any art. I have studied Judo and BJJ. And I have gained knowledge from that trainig. What I have found is that all "jujutsu" based arts have a lot in common yet at the same time have differenses. Before anyone, including myself can point out flaws in any art we must first know enough about that art to make such claims. And what makes a particular technique indigenous to a particular style anyway? Every art has its strengthgs, weaknesses, and limitations. Hapkido, Judo, and BJJ included. All I can go by is what my 25 years of training has taught me. It is up to each individual to search for their own way. Maybe what I do does not fit most peoples definition of Hapkido. I train and teach elements of Wing Chun / Jeet Kune Do, Muay Thai, FMA, Judo, and BJJ along with my Hapkido. So maybe what I do is MMA with a street defense focus. Whatever it is, it works for me and those I teach. And thats what's important.
  7. mike321 is offline

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,461

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 4:42pm


     Style: kenpo, Wrestling

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Find your way, make your art work for you, it's the artist not the style, somethings work and some don't, blend, meld, refine....I could go on. This all leads to a general disservice to martial arts. Effectiveness matters and only evidence speaks to effectiveness. Training in a style is to serve the practitioner. In this day and age there is no reason to study arts shrouded in mystery. MMA has put it all on display for the work to see. And all arts are welcome. (For that matter cell phone video and the Internet is putting street fighting on a public stage, much smaller sample so far but the same styles are dominating this "arena" also.)
  8. Permalost is offline
    Permalost's Avatar

    pro nonsense self defense

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    12,553

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 5:00pm

    supporting member
     Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by YeongJin View Post
    Please remember I am not saying that other martial arts styles don't have any value. I am simply saying that if a person studies hapkido diligently then it will work for self defense.
    "Self Defense" is a very broad term that one could apply to everything from fighting terrorists to fighting a heart attack, so to say "X works for self-defense", there needs to be an explanation about what self defense means in that context.

    I should also note that the way I practice and teach hapkido has been modified because of my experience in the other arts I have studied. I found some of the training methods out dated. Learning so many techniques from someone grabbing your wrist. In my experience many Hapkido practitioners do spend a lot of time on wrist grab defenses which I don't really see as being the most efficient way to train. Ofcourse that's not all that the mainstream traditional guys do but they certainly do alot of it.
    So what did you take out, what did you modify, and what did you add? Where does hapkido end and "Wing Chun / Jeet Kune Do, Muay Thai, FMA, Judo, and BJJ along with my Hapkido" start? Also, what sort of FMA do you study?

    I would like to know your justification for saying that many hapkido techiques are low percentage against "real people" which techniques are you refering to? This is a hard assumption to make because hapkido varies greatly from one instructor to the next.
    There are some things that are very difficult to pull off against a truly resisting opponent, and the ones that I've seen in Hapkido include finger locks, stepping-through arm locks, spinning kicks, single point of contact throws, and Mortal Kombat sweeps. They occur rarely in competitions when allowed, and they're easy to fudge in training if the person tries to flail out of them. My idea of what is and isn't hapkido comes from training a little with a former hapkido teacher, and from Marc Tedeschi's Hapkido book (the big thick phone book one).
  9. TheGrayMan214 is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    West End, North Carolina... Out in the woods
    Posts
    4

    Posted On:
    4/27/2012 7:27pm

    Bullshido Newbie
     Style: Hapkido

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Here is another guy who hapkido has worked for. And for the record, YeongJin is my hapkido instructor and has been for nearly 20 years.

    I've bounced at Congo's Latin Club in Fayetteville, NC (Made the news not to long ago because the doorman got shot and killed), I used the knowledge a couple times, did what I needed it to do.

    I've been downrange as a high risk civilian contractor, so I have learned a thing or two about combat the hard way, being shot a few times.

    I've taught Hapkido to Law Enforcement myself that came back to me and said that a technique I taught them worked for them. Hell, we've taught Hapkido to a former Tier 1 Special Operations retiree.

    In the end, no one martial art is king. No series of martial arts is king. Every discipline must come together. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH TRAINING IN ANY ONE OR ANY COMBINATION OF ARTS!!!

    The downside of MMA, BJJ, Judo, Taekwondo, and any other martial art that is used for a sport is not the art... it's the instructors that don't understand the first thing about using whatever they're teaching outside of the ring where there are no weight classes, absolutely no rules (because bad guys don't follow them anyway), and the bad guys bring friends. I love BJJ. But I don't want to be on the ground. I love boxing and kickboxing, but that makes for a mutual combat assault here in NC where we both go to jail. I love Jeet Kune Do, but blasting a guy into submission is an easy way to be the only one getting locked up. I love hapkido, but without striking and entry training, it is highly ineffective. I love the Filipino Martial Arts, but I can't deploy my ASP or my blade for every situation. I love training for combat shooting, but my GLOCK isn't always the answer.

    All martial arts are good, all martial arts are bad, it just depends on how they're taught which traits are brought forth.
    Last edited by TheGrayMan214; 4/27/2012 7:33pm at . Reason: For The Record...
  10. mike321 is offline

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,461

    Posted On:
    4/28/2012 12:01am


     Style: kenpo, Wrestling

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by TheGrayMan214 View Post

    All martial arts are good, all martial arts are bad, it just depends on how they're taught which traits are brought forth.
    I disagree. Some martial arts consistently develop useful fighting skills for a wide range of people that can be objectively demonstrated to work; some martial arts do not. The thread is about whether hapkido is in the first or second category. Since we are on the Internet we can't use your personal experience as evidence. We don't have the ability to evaluate your character and whether you are a reliable source. We also can't easily corroborate any stories. It sucks but that is the nature of the media we are using. Also, to evaluate a style multiple types of people must see success with it. If you are inherently tough, athletic, and work in jobs that require physical confrontation, how do we separate the style from the person? I have a desk job. I can't use my personal experience to supplement an art. It needs to work and I need conclusive evidence that it works. Please note I am not in any way calling out hapkido. The question is the title of the thread and it is a legitimate question for all arts.
Page 1 of 7 1 2345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.