Results 71 to 80 of 109
-
Moderator
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Australia, Land of Oz
- Posts
- 4,960
- Points
- 9,114



Posted On:
4/03/2012 5:06pm -
-
Shime Waza Test Dummy
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 3,627
- Points
- 3,569


Posted On:
4/03/2012 7:03pm

Style: StrikeyGrappling & WW2-fu1
First off, why the hell would you tell someone they're going on "Ignore"? Just do it. & Second, why announce that you're going to do it before you know if you can do it or not? & Third, you can just ignore someone by choice, you don't have to interact with their stupidity/belligerence/whatever, kinda like you do in real life?
"Judo is a study of techniques with which you may kill if you wish to kill, injure if you wish to injure, subdue if you wish to subdue, and, when attacked, defend yourself" - Jigoro Kano (1889)
***Was this quote "taken out of context"?***
"The judoist has no time to allow himself a margin for error, especially in a situation upon which his or another person's very life depends...."
~ The Secret of Judo (Jiichi Watanabe & Lindy Avakian), p.19
"Hope is not a method... nor is enthusiasm."
~ Brigadier General Gordon Toney -
-
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 8
- Points
- 76
Posted On:
4/04/2012 8:51am -
-
Registered Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Location
- Troy NY
- Posts
- 25
- Points
- 89
Posted On:
4/11/2012 9:29pm
--
Pretty awesome video, going to add him to my list of awesome skeptics (Neil Degrasse Tyson is my hero). I would say watching it should be a requirement for joining the forums but as has clearly been demonstrated, half the newbies (and some of the older farts) have a deep seated urge to make it about them or their art vs the world.
There should be a giant banner on the website that explains exactly how skepticism works.
*bows head in shame* okay -
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Posts
- 4
- Points
- 66
Posted On:
5/14/2012 8:23am
Style: Wing Chun--
While I "generally" agree with this guy...but
I'm a Wing Chun relatively new practitioner - and an admitted newbie to this forum,...but I have been studying Zen Buddhism for some 20 years or so...
I do have a few points to make:
1. I don't think Matt Thornton fully understands "Buddhism" as a "religion" means well millions of things to millions of people.
2. In particular, for millions of people, my self included, "Buddhism" is indeed a thing that encourages the attitude of if you can't know about it (e.g., life after death) you don't say you know about it. (I would prefer to call it a "religion" instead of "spiritual" for precisely the reasons Thompson brings out - I deplore new age fluff or superstition.)
3. I would take every single point everyone makes about CMA/JMA - and Wing Chun especially - as "having no ground game" and all that...and reply, "Point taken, but for many practitioners, myself it's not particularly relevant" because...
4. There's aspects to martial arts as 功夫 - "kung fu" - in its original sense as to be a person of accomplishment that means that whatever some or all of the TMA/CMA/JMA martial arts "lack" in terms of ability in an actual fight is more than made up for by the psychological/motor skills/social/... benefits provided. Thompson kind of makes this point, I think but I think it's much stronger than he makes it.
That last point is a subject for a whole other thread probably.Last edited by Mumon; 5/14/2012 8:38am at .



Reply With Quote
















Posted On:
4/03/2012 4:47pm