-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 152
- Points
- 228

Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:09pm
Style: fma--
i'm no stranger to chicago - i go up there at least twice a year, and have been up there twice in the past three months. i'll be up there again in the spring. in the meantime, stop guessing, stop taking the 'history' that you're fed by fma instructors as gospel, and do some research.
tim -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Colorado Springs
- Posts
- 19
- Points
- 115

Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:19pm
Style: VAJ, Sei Shin Jitsu--
I'm jumping in here as I agree with a lot of what's been said. Speaking from my own experience in teaching and training in numerous Philipino arts. I can say that stick, knife, and empty hand do follow the same basic concepts. However application for each definitely varies. Distance is a key factor. The longer the weapon the more distance you need. Impact vs edged weapon is also a factor with the amount of power needed to do damage. Swinging your empty hand the same way you would swing a weapon only works if for the most part all you're throwing is Hammerfist strikes.
With that in mind I have seen people very skilled at empty hand use weapons very well. Boxers punching with a knife in their hand would do a lot of damage. The only thing is none of them practice it, rightfully so, as it's not what they're training to do.
Footwork was mentioned and for the street application I teach it all the same. As for competition it's different with lead leg and power hand being different than using a weapon. The one benefit to swinging a stick is increased hand speed for empty hand techniques. This could also be accomplished by using a small dumbbell as well though.
I've never heard of Philipino trench warfare but I'd be interested in seeing something about it. -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 1,781
- Points
- 3,485

Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:39pm -
pro nonsense self defense
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Location
- San Diego
- Posts
- 10,985
- Points
- 13,162

Awards:
Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:52pm
Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs--
But when the Spanish became involved in the PI, they weren't carrying broadswords so much as weapons more like this:
And the spear/lance has always been a pretty important weapon too.
Interesting. Do you recommend any sources on Spanish fighting arts?
Yeah, my teacher was one of Ben Largusa's students in the 70s, became a guro of the system, then became a student of Cacoy Canete in the 80s, so there's a bit of a mishmash.does that style have any relation to villabrille? as far as i can tell, the usage of those terms always lead back to him. (btw, it's estocada in the book, and the terms in spanish fencing mean much different things than they do in villabrille's arnis).
tim
Yeah, just from the picture, it appears that parada and estoc(ad)a are different from the aris terms; I just thought it was an interesting note. Do you know what the Spanish terms mean? Does estoca have anything to do with estoc (thrusting sword)?
I'd like that. I recognize that a low stance can be used quickly and explosively (9 years of CLF and being a fencing enthusiast has shown me lots of examples), but there's a time and a place, and kung fu and TSD taught me that the time and place was all the time and everywhere, and untraining that has proven very useful to me. -
Featherweight
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 29
- Points
- 125
Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:55pm
Style: Silat--
Well... Here you go. http://www.britannica.com.ph/governm...re-381117.html
It's in their philippines section, but even that doesn't say a terrible lot.
At the onset of war, the Filipino army used the conventional method of trench warfare and open charges. If you’ve seen movies like The Patriot and movies about Napoleon, you would have an idea of how the Filipino army fought foolishly marching head high in open battle fields before they finally resorted to guerilla warfare.
http://antipinoy.com/the-army-of-the...pine-republic/
There's another.
http://www.americainwwii.com/stories...gbastards.html
And that one seems to be the full story.Last edited by Eskrimador; 12/14/2011 3:05pm at .
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Colorado Springs
- Posts
- 19
- Points
- 115

Posted On:
12/14/2011 3:03pm
Style: VAJ, Sei Shin Jitsu--
Trench warfare extract from Britannica Online.
Warfare in which the opposing sides attack, counterattack, and defend from sets of trenches dug into the ground. It was developed by Vauban, Sébastien Le Prestre in the 17th century for laying siege to fortresses. Its defensive use was first institutionalized as a tactic during the American Civil War. It reached its highest development in World War I. Little used in World War II, it reappeared in the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. A typical construction consisted of two to four parallel trenches, each dug in a zigzag, protected by sandbags, and floored with wooden planks. The parallel trenches were connected by a series of communication trenches dug roughly perpendicular to them. The first row was fronted by barbed wire and contained machine-gun emplacements; the rear trenches housed most of the troops. Increased use of tanks marked the end of trench warfare, since tanks were invulnerable to the machine-gun and rifle fire used by entrenched soldiers.
I was actually looking at this very article when you responded. Where does it say that trenches were used in the Philipines?
-
Featherweight
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 29
- Points
- 125
Posted On:
12/14/2011 3:10pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 152
- Points
- 228

Posted On:
12/14/2011 3:14pm
Style: fma--
not precisely. the sabre wasn't widely used in western europe until the 18th century. when the spaniards became involved with the philippines in the 16th century, their military and civilian swords looked more like this:

not in english, not yet. that should change in the next couple years.
kinda. estocada means thrust, parada means parry. the image you posted shows the thrust of second, the parry of sixth, and the three parts of the salute. most likely, that manual is derived from italian sabre methods. do you have a link to the thread on the vikingsword forum where it was discussed?
that's funny - i usually have the opposite problem of getting people to be willing to try to use them at all. :)
tim -
Featherweight
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Posts
- 29
- Points
- 125
Posted On:
12/14/2011 4:20pm
Style: Silat--
I missed out on mentioning this earlier when you posted this, although I've mentioned this much already, I'm going to put more emphasis on it now because it is of special importance to this particular discussion.how long have you studied fma, and what styles? were any of them from pampanga, or luzon at all? or is all of your knowledge from sinawali from inosanto drills?
Sinawali is not just a drill. It's the entire blue print for how FMA works. It is MY opinion that Sinawali is hands down one of the most important things you can practice in any form of FMA stick/sword/knife fighting simply because each movement means something, as does each chamber of the stick/swords/knife(knives).
Angle 1 is a downward slice from the right shoulder and it is immediately chambered up on the shoulder; protecting the neck. That same movement is your umbrella/roof block which EASILY turns into your Dog Brother's style bolo uppercut. That's just one very short example and I'm sure all of you know how a sinawali drill works, but that's the foundation of this topic, I think.
In empty hand, just as in stick or knife, your attack is automatically supposed to turn into your defense, your second strike can be just as destructive depending on circumstance and in a flash, the first strike you threw automatically becomes your counter attack. It would seem that based on the circumstance, the principle of "block, check, counter" can generate almost any combination of attacks and defenses based on the weapons in play or lack thereof.
This principle is the blue print for how single stick can take on double stick and win, vice versa and how all other weapons have the potential to win or lose against each other. It's not just a series of strikes and chambers.
That's just my view, though. I'm wondering if anyone agrees.



Reply With Quote











Registered Member
Posted On:
12/14/2011 2:02pm
Style: fma