-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- partz unknown, Buckeye Country
- Posts
- 122
- Points
- 101

Posted On:
11/18/2011 10:37am -
Super Moderator
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- West Coast
- Posts
- 22,370
- Points
- 31,526




Awards:
Posted On:
11/18/2011 12:48pm -
Super Moderator
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- West Coast
- Posts
- 22,370
- Points
- 31,526




Awards:
Posted On:
11/18/2011 12:52pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- santo domingo, dominican republic
- Posts
- 961
- Points
- 1,694

Posted On:
11/18/2011 2:09pm
Style: BJJ / freestyle wrestling--
i think i sort of agree with the buck sargeant in the sens that you don't purely box in MMA. ie. you have to be weary of the takedown, knees, et all, so you change your game up a bit.
whereas, the changes in wrestling/jiujitsu are in fact there, i don't feel they are as prevalent. just my opinion though. but yeah, you CAN win just using pure boxing, but i see that as harder to happen than winning using pure wrestling (Lay'n'Pray anyone?) -
Featherweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 64
- Points
- 1,142


Posted On:
11/24/2011 9:39am
Style: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu--
Boxing training is more common in MMA because everyone is afraid to get taken down after a kick. So it does make sense, although if your kickboxing is high level enough, you will be too fast and precise to get taken down, like Jose Aldo - quick return on the kick, very hard to get taken down.
-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 879
- Points
- 1,478


Posted On:
11/24/2011 11:48am
Style: Western Boxing, Tai Chi--
To me, boxing is less about form, and more about success within the Queensberry ruleset. I've seen elite boxers who give their opposition fits simply by being unorthodox.
I have no problem regarding some mixed martial artists as boxers. Very much appreciated Anderson Silva's book Boxing for MMA.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 103
- Points
- 164

Posted On:
11/27/2011 12:52am
Style: Boxing, JKD--
This is actually a huge pet peeve of mine. It seems nonsensical to describe any MMA fighter in an MMA fight as "having better boxing" or "having better wrestling" than anyone else. What the "better boxers" are doing is PUNCHING better than the other guy and better wrestlers have better TAKEDOWNS or GROUND CONTROL than the other guy. If you get rid of trying to parse everything that happens as coming from some other sport that happens to use that technique, all of this crap goes away. There's no issue with GSP never having put on a singlet and gone out on a mat because THAT'S A DIFFERENT SPORT. What he does well in MMA is takedowns and ground control which he clearly didn't learn from wrestling because, as we've mention, he never wrestled. See where I'm going with this?
It's the same thing when someone does and throw and it's described as a "judo throw" even though every form of grappling does has the same technique, not to mention the fact that that throw is invented every day on school yards by kids who have never heard of judo and can't spell wrestling. Arbitrarily mapping every movement in an MMA match into some OTHER SPORT makes discussing it much harder, as the OP and his buddy have discovered.



Reply With Quote



















Registered Member
Posted On:
11/17/2011 7:44am
Style: Taijiquan