-
Middleweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 2,410
- Points
- 3,658


Posted On:
10/17/2011 2:55pm--
I may be completely wrong on this but I thought the commentator asked him if he'd give Hopkins a re-match. He replied with an emphatic 'No' to that so when he was asked who he wanted next, I thought he said "Pacquiao". Nor did he seem to be joking.
The thought occurred that he should try Vitali or Vlad but of course, they'd be too big - haha.
My ears and my good self could have misheard so I could be very wrong... -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Bhudda Indiana
- Posts
- 866



Posted On:
10/17/2011 2:59pm -
Middleweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Location
- London
- Posts
- 2,410
- Points
- 3,658


Posted On:
10/17/2011 3:06pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Bhudda Indiana
- Posts
- 866



Posted On:
10/17/2011 3:37pm -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 879
- Points
- 1,478


Posted On:
10/17/2011 4:43pm
Style: Western Boxing, Tai Chi--
Agbeko-Mares was a million times worse, and almost made me quit watching boxing altogether. Then the IBF mandated a rematch, and I saw there is some justice in boxing.
I notice a weird pattern in big boxing events. Main events always end in controversy, while the undercards end up being legendary. Even if Hopkins-Dawson went to 12 rounds, it would have never been as good as DeMarco-Linares -- which was on the undercard.
Originally Posted by Super8astard
Same thing happened to Mayweather-Ortiz. Morales-Cano was on the undercard and was amazing. Arce-Vasquez was on the undercard of Pacquiao-Mosley, and was the better fight.
Here's how I think American boxing can be fixed:
- Stop promoting the undercards as undercards
- Start promoting them as double or triple header main events
- Let casual fans know that there's more than one potential spectacular fight on the menu
Problem solved. Instead of people turning on the TV for one big superfight, have them tune in for two or three -- and let it be known that anything can happen. Sometimes you'll see art, sometimes fireworks, sometimes controversy. -
--
James Toney sez: http://fighthype.com/pages/content10995.html
Also, Toney once fought an entire fight with a ripped bicep, so it would have sickened him seeing Hopkins give up like that last night.
IMO, thou there is a grain of truth in there, Chad shouldn't have 'rassled' him in the first place.
(tab) Forum > Forum Actions > General Settings > in Thread Display Options > Number of Posts to Show Per Page: 40 -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Vancouver
- Posts
- 879
- Points
- 1,478


Posted On:
10/17/2011 5:32pm
Style: Western Boxing, Tai Chi--
Toney always talks ****. Hopkins would have continued if he was given the option, but wanted to use his (legitimate) injury as a stalling tactic. It backfired on him.
This should still be ruled NC since it's apparent within the rules that a TKO can only happen due to a punch. -
Light Heavyweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- London,Ontario Canada
- Posts
- 3,113
- Points
- 4,577


Posted On:
10/17/2011 6:55pm--
Who cares what Toney thinks.
He 's an MMA fighter now, he's too busy working on his ground game , which is ' Good ' according to him, to know what's going on in Boxing anymore." If one wants to have a friend one must also want to wage war for him: and to wage war one must be capable of being an enemy." - Fr. Nietzsche 'On The Friend' Thus Spake Zarathustra



Reply With Quote













Registered Member
Posted On:
10/16/2011 6:06pm
Style: Issh"i"nryu fixed....