Enforcer of Northeast Anti-Silliness Department Inc.
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:40pm
Style: Kaju, BJJ, Judo, Kempo
Don't get me wrong, striking of course is a necessary part of fighting, but all this focus on the striking range of fighting just seems excessive considering the realities of combat. All you need to do to nullify a striker is cover up, close the distance and grab him.
I mean if you can get lucky and hit a guy and drop him then good for you, but why risk it when you can just force the clinch and take him down, then punch him while he's on his back?
I see so many dedicating hours and hours of training into developing a skillset that really only is useful in a kickboxing match, I don't get you people.
Knowing is not enough, you must apply...
...Willing is not enough you must do ~Bruce Lee
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:48pm
Style: BJJ, MT, MMA, CQB
Originally Posted by Ke?poFist
The quality of trolling on this site is really going downhill.
Style: Chinese Boxing
Haven't you ever heard of a punchers chance?
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:50pm
Style: Trad Ju Jitsu
No grappling here.
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:51pm
Style: Karate & Kickboxing
Because I want to...
Simple question, simple answer.
1% Shark is better than you.
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:53pm
Because grappling is gay!
Originally Posted by Eddie Hardon
No grappling here.
They grappled when they got back home.
When I Get Back
Posted On:9/07/2011 1:55pm
Because we need to train our nightmarish cocoon of unstoppable haymakerflurries
Style: Stick, Taiji, combatives
Because punching someone in the face is fun.
Combatives training log.
Gezere: paraphrase from Bas Rutten, Never escalate the level of violence in fight you are losing. :D
pro nonsense self defense
Style: FMA, dumbek, Indian clubs
Ke?pofist has surely already heard all of the striking counterarguments out there.
Articles and Reviews
Tools and Info