-
Gnarly King of Half-Guard
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 4,137
- Points
- 6,434

Posted On:
7/14/2011 5:13am--
You can have the ankle under either armpit, but if you turn it has to be to the outside i.e. looking away from his free leg. If your opponent turns the other way to escape you can follow him, though (assuming the ref knows what he's doing).
Nowhere in the official rules is this even fucking hinted at, of course. -
Welterweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Posts
- 521
- Points
- 745
Posted On:
7/14/2011 6:30am
Style: belt and jacket wrestling--
They have the most ridiculous ruleset involving ankle locks, even reaping the knee. I've seen great matches (locally) where someone gets DQed over little nuances in the rules about ankles, including reaping the knee, going high-side with the lock, etc. I've played with ankle locks from day one, and they are probably the safest submission that I use on a regular basis.
-
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 7
- Points
- 139
Posted On:
7/14/2011 10:40am
Style: bjj--
I have found this page,would you say this is correct
http://goatfury.blogspot.com/2009/05...-footlock.html -
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 7
- Points
- 139
Posted On:
7/14/2011 10:42am
Style: bjj--
Would you say this is correct for ibjjf rules,cheers.
http://goatfury.blogspot.com/2009/05...-footlock.html -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Brisbane, Australia
- Posts
- 962
- Points
- 1,471


Posted On:
7/19/2011 2:47am
Style: BJJ/Zumba--
This is something I've been really curious about. Our Gym Comps are the only ones that allow straight kneebars and ankle locks at Blue belt gi...everything else (IBJJF/ABJJF) has them banned till Purple (kneebars till Brown)?
Seems a bit whack, and the lack of knee reap is fucking silly, only now trying to work out the definitions as I cut across their hips to counter the escape. Sadface, wish there was Sambo around.
[Over Generalisation] Most Blue's can't even do a proper fucking straight ankle lock, let alone be able to hit and finish it during a competition roll, eruughh. [/Over Generalisation]
I'm a year into my Blue, and I really want to practice this stuff for comps (we can at the Gym, and it's great fun, like a whole new level of learning), not having the locks at comp level makes it really bad form for people lazy with their legs. I can grasp why no kneebars (risk of falling and just aggressive noob cranking), but not the ankle locks with leg reap, it's a powerful control position and actually forces you to think and counter moves and not be lazy with feet! -
Gnarly King of Half-Guard
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 4,137
- Points
- 6,434

Posted On:
7/19/2011 4:21am -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- Brisbane, Australia
- Posts
- 962
- Points
- 1,471


Posted On:
7/19/2011 11:27pm -
Gnarly King of Half-Guard
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 4,137
- Points
- 6,434

Posted On:
7/20/2011 4:51am--
I know because I asked this at an IBJJF rules seminar, not through decoding the incoherent rules on the website.
However, I think the way it works is that 'FOOT LOCK S(ANY KIND)' in the kids division refers to both the straight ankle lock and the 'MATA LEO WITH FOOT' (toehold), then in the adult divisions 'LEG LOCK' means kneebar, god knows why it says 'KNEE LOCK' on the same line as well in the kid's divisions. If 'LEG LOCKS' was meant to be all lower-body attacks then they wouldn't have to list toeholds and 'FOOT LOCK S(ANY KIND)' on separate lines.Last edited by PointyShinyBurn; 7/20/2011 4:54am at .



Reply With Quote












Posted On:
7/14/2011 4:55am
Style: bjj
Ankle lock legal positions for ibjjf