-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 490
- Points
- 709

Posted On:
4/18/2011 10:34pm
Style: Limalama--
Normally, I am against any gun restrictions to an extent, and yeah it does seem a little stupid for my doctor to waste my precious time in his office with questions about my guns instead of my health, but it also seems kinda stupid that a private doctor would be restricted from asking ANY questions of his patients.
edit:// Yes, docs asking about my guns is a waste of time, but banning said questions from taking place is an even bigger waste of time. I just don't see the problem with it.Last edited by donoraen; 4/18/2011 10:37pm at . Reason: wasn't very clear
-
...is THE PENETRATOR
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 6,799
- Points
- 9,874



Posted On:
4/19/2011 2:06pm

Style: German longsword, .45 ACP--
As a MPH I view this campaign as being part of an effort to stigmatize gun ownership, just as for example cigarette smoking or eating deep fried food has been stigmatized. That is why I feel it is inappropriate to use the authority of the medical establishment in this way.
“nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you’re a hit man or a video gamer.” - Jack Thompson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Th...%28attorney%29 -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 490
- Points
- 709

Posted On:
4/19/2011 9:49pm -
LVL 99 Photomancer
Achievements:- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Tasmania, Australia
- Posts
- 3,132
- Points
- 5,128




Posted On:
4/19/2011 10:02pm--
Sounds like a very legitimate concern from where I'm sitting. Your viewpoint that this is discriminatory against gun owners (If I understand your criticism properly) Is clearly not based on a concern for the wellbeing of the patients, but rather for a semi-political personal or community goal for gun acceptance. (or at least, to avoid demonization of guns).
Originally Posted by Ronin's source
Now, I can understand this on an academic level, though I do not feel encouraged to agree with the opponents to the AAP.
Personally, I think such questions are entirely appropriate for a Doctor to ask their patients, or ask of their patients' parents, and therefore any politicking in the background is well outside of my own level of concern. I'm actually pretty appalled that Doctors questioning patients is the angle of attack chosen by the pro-gun lobbyists, and therefore it's a pretty ridiculous criticism to level at the AAP. -
Certified Fitness Trainer
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Posts
- 4,013
- Points
- 6,322




Posted On:
4/19/2011 10:32pm--
In the United States, 2010, there were 2.6 million crimes attempted in which the victims had to draw or use their gun to prevent the crime. In 95% of these cases, not a single shot was fired. That means that there were 2.6 million crimes prevented by guns, and of those, ironically, 2.47 million were prevented non-violently.
The basic premise is that criminals are criminals, and by definition flout the law. Banning guns only guarantees that law-abiding citizens are less armed than criminals. Take drugs as an example. In the US, on the federal level, they're all illegal, including marijuana. And except in California, Colorado, and perhaps a couple others I'm forgetting, they're illegal on the state level too (in these states, restricted marijuana use is permitted). Not only is their possession illegal, but so is buying, selling, producing, or using them. But they're everywhere nonetheless. Legally banning something doesn't get rid of it, it only means that the criminals have the upper hand.Click To Get My Free Training Newsletter... Do It NOW!
"You all just got fucking owned.";
"TaeBo_Master and GajusCaesar just scored 10,000,000 points on all you pawns."
- The Wastrel -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 490
- Points
- 709

Posted On:
4/20/2011 1:07am -
Senior Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Chesterfield, VA
- Posts
- 1,826
- Points
- 2,455




Posted On:
4/20/2011 1:30am
Style: None--
I would imagine it falls under the “prevention is better than a cure” adage. Why should a doctor ask if a kid is eating vegetables regularly? Why should a doctor ask parents how often they give their children sugary foods? I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with a parent owning a gun, but I do know that it only takes one story of a three year old accidentally shooting his five year old brother to break your heart.
Maybe some doctor somewhere up the chain couldn't down enough Scotch to feel better, so he floated an idea and the Think of the Children™ effect took hold. -
...is THE PENETRATOR
Achievements:- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 6,799
- Points
- 9,874



Posted On:
4/20/2011 2:11pm

Style: German longsword, .45 ACP--
I am not saying it is discriminatory, or that is not my main concern. My concern is that it is part of a propaganda war to portray gun ownership as backwards and irresponsible, much like smoking, by using the social authority of doctors.
I think it is a fiendishly brilliant play by anti gun forces because I feel like the most important long term threat to gun ownership is the aging of its supporters and a failure of young people to get into shooting sports and get educated about firearms.“nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you’re a hit man or a video gamer.” - Jack Thompson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Th...%28attorney%29 -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 29
Posted On:
4/23/2011 7:07am



Reply With Quote















...is THE PENETRATOR
Posted On:
4/18/2011 8:35pm
Style: German longsword, .45 ACP
Write the American Academy of Pediatrics and tell them to drop anti-gun politics