-
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 120
- Points
- 266

Posted On:
6/20/2011 11:47pm -
Thumbs up!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Oakland, CA (East Bay Area)
- Posts
- 2,258
- Points
- 3,274


Posted On:
6/21/2011 2:49am--
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0..._n_188541.html
if you can find the original forum notes or video, i'm sure we could find someone to translate it. in any case, i'm not a fan of his because of his political beliefs, i'm a fan of his films and that's it.when he was asked to discuss censorship and restrictions on filmmakers in China. He expanded his comments to include society.
"I'm not sure if it's good to have freedom or not," Chan said. "I'm really confused now. If you're too free, you're like the way Hong Kong is now. It's very chaotic. Taiwan is also chaotic."
Chan added: "I'm gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we're not being controlled, we'll just do what we want." -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 496
- Points
- 744

Posted On:
6/21/2011 4:43am -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 116
- Points
- 17
Posted On:
6/21/2011 12:53pm
--
Ah, it isn't a quotation issue so much as it is a difference in how we interpret that quote.
" when he was asked to discuss censorship and restrictions on filmmakers in China. He expanded his comments to include society."
Remove the part where it says he expanded his comments to include society because that is the reporters opinion not based on the actual quote from Jackie, and you just have Jackie answering a question about allowing freedom in film which would make sense considering the topic is about censorship of film.
I ignored the reporter's personal opinion about the subject being expanded because there is nothing to indicate that Jackie ever expanded the subject outside of film. The question was about freedom in film, and he answered talking about his distaste of where freedom in film has lead the Hong Kong and Taiwan film industry.
It is my personal opinion that it is more likely the reporter added the bit about Jackie expanding it to society as a whole to either stir up interest in his article or fit the agenda of his newspaper. I never saw anything in Jackie's quote to indicate that he moved on from the subject of film.
Also, the list of injuries Jackie Chan has gone through only to show back up on set and keep filming make me feel as if I'm spending too much time online. I think I'm going to go do some pushups. Running a fever is no excuse for not working out. -
Thumbs up!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Oakland, CA (East Bay Area)
- Posts
- 2,258
- Points
- 3,274


Posted On:
6/21/2011 2:04pm--
he was talking about hong kong and taiwan and chinese people as a whole, not just the film industry. not sure how you're not getting that, even removing the author's "opinion." it's okay to disagree with people you like, or are you so invested in chan as an idol you can't do that?"I'm not sure if it's good to have freedom or not," Chan said. "I'm really confused now. If you're too free, you're like the way Hong Kong is now. It's very chaotic. Taiwan is also chaotic."
Chan added: "I'm gradually beginning to feel that we Chinese need to be controlled. If we're not being controlled, we'll just do what we want."
Chan said the problem with Chinese youth is that "they like other people's things. They don't like their own things." Young people need to spend more time developing their own style, he added.
The action hero complained that Chinese goods still have too many quality problems. He became emotional when discussing contaminated milk powder that sickened tens of thousands of Chinese babies in the past year.
Speaking fast with his voice rising, Chan said, "If I need to buy a TV, I'll definitely buy a Japanese TV. A Chinese TV might explode." -
Registered Member
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2011
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 116
- Points
- 17
Posted On:
6/21/2011 2:50pm
--
I don't know. I wish there was a video of it so we could have the whole thing in context translated in a question and answer format vs the article format so we can clearly see answers to questions and not quotes that could be placed out of context.
It isn't that Jackie Chan is my idol so much that it is the fact that I worked for a newspaper for 4 years, and I became inherently distrustful in the way articles and quotations are often handled when they are used in an article of this nature. That is why I prefer unedited video or a straight this was my question and this was his answer to this question format. I can't begin to count the number of complaints the newspaper received when I worked there because people were misrepresented. Technically the newspaper never did anything wrong, but the slant put on the articles and the way quotes were used often created massive misunderstandings from what the people meant. It sold papers, but it never made us many friends.
I could see how this article could have used the same tactic had they wished to do so at least this is the way the translation that I read came across to me. This is why I'm more likely to agree with Chan's representative when they said it was about the entertainment industry and not society as a whole. It is hard to say which is true without the direct question and statement format as the TV remark could have come from another question not related to entertainment. Though, I would be inclined to agree with his assessment of the quality of Chinese goods. -
Thumbs up!
Achievements:- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Oakland, CA (East Bay Area)
- Posts
- 2,258
- Points
- 3,274


Posted On:
6/21/2011 3:15pm--
thanks for getting me to look this up further. took some digging, but here it is.
i don't know how good your chinese is, but there's a translation in the description and in this blog post: http://cfensi.wordpress.com/2009/04/...talking-about/
that said, i don't fully agree with the way this person has translated it or interpreted it. he's definitely talking about more than just the film industry, but there isn't as much about "democracy" specifically. more like just about chinese culture being reckless or immature, which i also disagree with. not as clearcut as the huff article would lead you to believe, though, so you're right about that.



Reply With Quote














Registered Member
Posted On:
6/20/2011 11:20pm