228072 Bullies, 4600 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 151 to 160 of 164
Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 61213141516 17 LastLast
  1. All Dice is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    98

    Posted On:
    4/19/2011 9:25pm


     Style: BAWXIN'

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by florkle View Post
    I've done a few CMs. What's this got to do with martial arts?

    People have a right to protest whatever the **** they want and do it whatever the fucking way they can get away with. So far CM has not been able to be stopped despite arrests, fines, "police escorts" you name it.

    I say more power to them.
    ****
    5char
  2. Gustard is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Moving
    Posts
    196

    Posted On:
    5/04/2011 10:13pm


     Style: Judo, BJJ

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by Phrost View Post
    I dont care how ridiculous you think these cyclists are - that you seem to be happy to point out how spoilt, misguided and stupid they are and yet seem relatively uncritical of the utterly psychopathic behaviour of the driver in this youtube video makes you, Phrost, MY douchebag of the month.
    Last edited by Gustard; 5/04/2011 10:21pm at .
  3. joan ranger is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ontario, canada
    Posts
    11

    Posted On:
    7/10/2011 7:15am


     Style: taekwondo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    i say take all bike riders off the road. they are a bunch of spandex-wearing yupppy-old men who should take up the sport of 'rocking chair'. get off the road, it was never built for you and it is you, and only you who are to blame for accidents.
  4. Homernoid is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    130

    Posted On:
    7/10/2011 2:24pm


     Style: Taijiquan

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by joan ranger View Post
    i say take all bike riders off the road. they are a bunch of spandex-wearing yupppy-old men who should take up the sport of 'rocking chair'. get off the road, it was never built for you and it is you, and only you who are to blame for accidents.
    joan ranger, you are a fucking moron.
    the question, who is to blame for what, usually is a judical question. and in that quiet obvious way, more often than not, the party with more ability to harm or injure is bearing more responsibility and therefore, in case of an accident, is (more) to blame, at least.

    And this is, why Gustard is absolutely right, when he's saying:

    Quote Originally Posted by Gustard View Post
    I dont care how ridiculous you think these cyclists are - that you seem to be happy to point out how spoilt, misguided and stupid they are and yet seem relatively uncritical of the utterly psychopathic behaviour of the driver in this youtube video makes you, Phrost, MY douchebag of the month.
  5. joan ranger is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ontario, canada
    Posts
    11

    Posted On:
    7/10/2011 4:43pm


     Style: taekwondo

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    homernoid: speaking in generalities, two cars collide. the onus is on the one who hit the other first. regardless of whether or not the one who hits two, is by law, guilty of a number of infractions according the The Highway Traffic Act. what you are saying is that one is by law, the defendant as one had 'more ability to harm or injure is bearing more responsibility. of course because he struck two first. without speaking legal ease, how do you justify your incoherent statement. ps. here's a bar of soap. go wash out your mouth.
  6. It is Fake is offline
    It is Fake's Avatar

    Administrator

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    34,012

    Posted On:
    7/10/2011 5:17pm

    staff
     Style: xingyi

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by joan ranger View Post
    homernoid: speaking in generalities, two cars collide. the onus is on the one who hit the other first. regardless of whether or not the one who hits two, is by law, guilty of a number of infractions according the The Highway Traffic Act. what you are saying is that one is by law, the defendant as one had 'more ability to harm or injure is bearing more responsibility. of course because he struck two first. without speaking legal ease, how do you justify your incoherent statement. ps. here's a bar of soap. go wash out your mouth.
    When he's done you need to use that soap as well.
  7. Yoj is offline
    Yoj's Avatar

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,825

    Posted On:
    7/10/2011 5:59pm


     Style: Aikijujutsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by joan ranger View Post
    speaking in generalities, two cars collide. the onus is on the one who hit the other first.
    You are an idiot, the cars hit each other at the same time. Physics is not your friend is it?
  8. Homernoid is offline

    Registered Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    130

    Posted On:
    7/11/2011 2:31am


     Style: Taijiquan

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    joan ranger you are a MORON.
    Imagine folowing picture:
    a pedestrian, while totally ignoring traffic rules, crosses a street in a very dangerous way. the driver of that car aproaching realizes in a blink the pedestrians mistake. The named driver is still in a comfortable distance to stop his vehicle thus avoiding an accident.

    now the prized question:
    is that driver allowed to run over the foolish pedestrian or is there the easy to comprehend rule to be cautious and to avoid accidents for the sake of it?

    tell me, please.
    not understanding that very basic fact makes you a moron indeed.
  9. TaeBo_Master is offline
    TaeBo_Master's Avatar

    Certified Fitness Trainer

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    4,002

    Posted On:
    7/11/2011 2:39am

    supporting memberforum leader
     Style: Judo, Jujitsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by joan ranger View Post
    homernoid: speaking in generalities, two cars collide. the onus is on the one who hit the other first. regardless of whether or not the one who hits two, is by law, guilty of a number of infractions according the The Highway Traffic Act. what you are saying is that one is by law, the defendant as one had 'more ability to harm or injure is bearing more responsibility. of course because he struck two first. without speaking legal ease, how do you justify your incoherent statement. ps. here's a bar of soap. go wash out your mouth.
    Whereas typically, a 4-month necro isn't that big of a deal... in this case, I lobby to have this poster dragged out and shot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Yoj View Post
    You are an idiot, the cars hit each other at the same time. Physics is not your friend is it?
    This is the true. Unless of course, you want to involve some funky Relativity where each car is traveling at different speeds, and therefore the occupants of each car are operating under a different meaning of time.
    Click To Get My Free Training Newsletter... Do It NOW!


    "You all just got fucking owned.";
    "TaeBo_Master and GajusCaesar just scored 10,000,000 points on all you pawns."

    - The Wastrel
  10. Yoj is offline
    Yoj's Avatar

    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,825

    Posted On:
    7/11/2011 8:07am


     Style: Aikijujutsu

    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by TaeBo_Master View Post
    This is the true. Unless of course, you want to involve some funky Relativity where each car is traveling at different speeds, and therefore the occupants of each car are operating under a different meaning of time.

    So if they are both moving at different speeds then at some point car A has a collision with car B, but B does not collide with A?

    Did the accident occur because Schroedingers cat escaped and ran across the road?
Page 16 of 17 FirstFirst ... 61213141516 17 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.