Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
Middleweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Chesterfield, VA
- Posts
- 1,826
- Points
- 2,455




Posted On:
2/13/2011 12:10am -
United States Marine.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Detroit
- Posts
- 9,484




Posted On:
2/13/2011 2:55pm--
Stupid thread is stupid, the screws were too tight. Its fixed
PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58
Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
-
Welterweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
- Snake Mountain, Eternia
- Posts
- 648
- Points
- 4,669




Posted On:
2/13/2011 8:45pm--
Don't **** this up. Your screws CANNOT be too tight for your Model 92. If your screws are "too tight" and your screws are going into the magazine well, then you are missing the grip screw lock washer(s) from the frame. IF YOU ARE MISSING ONE...you will tighten them all the way down and they will scratch/impede the insertion/removal of your magazine.
If you don't have one, basically it will allow your grip screws to be screwed down into the magazine well, which will either prevent you from inserting a magazine into the gun, or if you screw them in while the magazine is in the gun, you won't be able to get the magazine out.
Here's a picture, it's PART 69.
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=...w=1920&bih=888

Yeah...I know; Microsoft Paint FOR THE WIN! I also know that the grip screws don't protrude WHATSOEVER into the mag well when you use the lock washers (as barely indicated in my pic), but I'm not going for scale or technical accuracy, here. Just an explanation of what likely is amiss.Last edited by Lord Skeletor; 2/13/2011 9:13pm at .
-
United States Marine.
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Detroit
- Posts
- 9,484




Posted On:
2/13/2011 10:04pm--
i will go look, thank you!
PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58
Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
-
Middleweight
Achievements:- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Chesterfield, VA
- Posts
- 1,826
- Points
- 2,455




Posted On:
2/14/2011 5:08am--
Brownells: Beretta 92/96 Part# C97081
You can confirm it's the part labeled “69” in this schematic.
EDIT: I am proud that I've gone from knowing next to nothing about guns to being able to accurately diagnose a Beretta 92 problem based on my knowledge of M1911A1 internals (even though I used the wrong term for the part).Last edited by Robstafarian; 2/14/2011 5:12am at .



Reply With Quote


















United States Marine.
Posted On:
2/12/2011 12:16am
Style: RJJA Jujitsu, MCMAP
Beretta 92fs mag problems