Page 3 of 3 First 123
  1. #21
    3moose1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Oceanside
    Posts
    9,625
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BadUglyMagic View Post
    What is the rational to this?



    Too much money/Too much call of duty.

    PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:
    http://www.bullshido.net/forums/show...0&postcount=58


    Quote Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
    3moose1 is correct. Sig THAT, you fucker.

    Quote Originally Posted by sochin101 View Post
    I went out with a delightful young woman who was on a regimen of pills that made her taste of burned onions.
    That is not conducive to passionate cunnilingus, my friend, let me assure you.
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyOldGuy View Post
    I agree with moosey

  2. #22
    Cassius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,038
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Don't get me wrong, it's a high quality weapon. I'm just not sure why it has a super far forward mounted optic, a shorty barrel, and a bipod. I assume because it looks cool.
    "No. Listen to me because I know what I'm talking about here." -- Hannibal

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    17
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Ok, I don't know that much about rifles, but to me a sight or a scope mounted that far forward doesn't make a lot of sense to me. To me it would make more sense to have the sight further back, closer to my eyeball. A scope that far forward looks like it would cause a lot of strain on my eyes.

    To me, this picture below makes more sense:


  4. #24
    Rock Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    10,134
    --
    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BadUglyMagic View Post
    What is the rational to this?


    There isn't any that I can understand.

    That aimpoint has no magnification but still requires eye relief for the optics to present the widest field of view which I think is around 150mm and, for the shooter to be confident the dot he's seeing is actually 'on' where he thinks he's aiming.

    Additionally, if you take a close look at the height of the aimpoint over the height of the rear iron sight and where the roll of the cheek would be on the rifle, the two are quite miss-matched.
    "To sin by silence when one should protest makes cowards out of men".

    ~Ella Wheeler

Page 3 of 3 First 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Log in

Log in
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO