258660 Bullies, 5616 online  
  • Register
Our Sponsors:

Results 21 to 24 of 24
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Sponsored Links Spacer Image
  1. 3moose1 is offline
    3moose1's Avatar

    USMC Combat Instructor

    Join Date
    Jan 2008

    Posted On:
    12/14/2010 9:20pm

    Join us... or die
     Style: MCMAP, Judo, sex appeal

    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BadUglyMagic View Post
    What is the rational to this?

    Too much money/Too much call of duty.

    PROOF that I'm not a completely useless poster:

    Quote Originally Posted by Cy Q. Faunce
    3moose1 is correct. Sig THAT, you fucker.

    Quote Originally Posted by sochin101 View Post
    I went out with a delightful young woman who was on a regimen of pills that made her taste of burned onions.
    That is not conducive to passionate cunnilingus, my friend, let me assure you.
    Quote Originally Posted by HappyOldGuy View Post
    I agree with moosey
  2. Cassius is offline
    Cassius's Avatar


    Join Date
    Mar 2005

    Posted On:
    12/14/2010 10:23pm

    supporting memberforum leader
     Style: Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu

    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Don't get me wrong, it's a high quality weapon. I'm just not sure why it has a super far forward mounted optic, a shorty barrel, and a bipod. I assume because it looks cool.
    "No. Listen to me because I know what I'm talking about here." -- Hannibal
  3. Audio Goose is offline


    Join Date
    Dec 2010

    Posted On:
    12/16/2010 4:43pm

    Bullshido Newbie
     Style: TKD

    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Ok, I don't know that much about rifles, but to me a sight or a scope mounted that far forward doesn't make a lot of sense to me. To me it would make more sense to have the sight further back, closer to my eyeball. A scope that far forward looks like it would cause a lot of strain on my eyes.

    To me, this picture below makes more sense:

  4. Rock Ape is offline
    Rock Ape's Avatar

    Watch and Shoot !

    Join Date
    Mar 2006

    Posted On:
    12/16/2010 6:12pm


    Hell yeah! Hell no!
    Quote Originally Posted by BadUglyMagic View Post
    What is the rational to this?

    There isn't any that I can understand.

    That aimpoint has no magnification but still requires eye relief for the optics to present the widest field of view which I think is around 150mm and, for the shooter to be confident the dot he's seeing is actually 'on' where he thinks he's aiming.

    Additionally, if you take a close look at the height of the aimpoint over the height of the rear iron sight and where the roll of the cheek would be on the rifle, the two are quite miss-matched.
    "To sin by silence when one should protest makes cowards out of men".

    ~Ella Wheeler
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Powered by vBulletin™© contact@vbulletin.com vBulletin Solutions, Inc. 2011 All rights reserved.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO